• 2 Posts
  • 56 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 11th, 2023

help-circle
  • Why limit it to proprietary software? Almost every linux distro can run Github Copilot X and Jetbrains, which both have had more time to be publicly used and tested and work better in my opinion.

    Send me a video link of Mac having direct access to containers without using a VM (which ruins the point of containers). THAT is directly related to my actual work, as opposed to needing a robot to code for me specifically using Apple’s AI



  • Mojave@lemmy.worldtoStolen from Facebook@lemmy.caFirst time?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    They can and were used as IEDs when buried shallow and face-up with sharp rocks pressed against the screens.

    They hold a lot of internal pressure, and a car driving over it would puncture the screen, causing the TV body to rapidly depressurize and explode upwards in a hail of glass shards.

    This was how right-wing hero Pat Robertson was famously killed last year on his way to the annual youth slaughtering convention
















  • Mojave@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes✨️ Finish him. ✨️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    I ask with genuine curiosity, as I am not an academic and come from a software development mindset

    Why is paid-for services the only “legit” way to get others to evaluate your research? Why is it not kosher to publicly publish your research, and simply invite peers to evaluate it? This idea is essentially the entire process behind Open Source Software, and is the backbone of most modern tools/programs/apps/software/linux development.

    What does paying a publishing company provide you, as a researcher, that makes it worth it?