Name one time lubricant didn’t improve a situation 😌

No way, this stuff is just chef kiss, no notes.

Baggy legs, fitted (but not tight) around the hips and ass. Perfect for all genders 😌

Same dude.

I splurged on some “nice” sweat pants, and that’s pretty much all I wear for fall/winter/spring, when I have to leave the house. Cargo shorts for summer.

It used to be PJs all day every day, but those nice sweats were a game changer.

Skinny pants are impossible to put on and remove when it’s hot.
And don’t talk to me about the swamp ass from squished butt cheeks all day.

Thank you, thank you 🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️🙌

He wanted to drain the swamp to make room for the sewage he pumped in

The only reason to lie is external to the case, but that’s a bold move assuming reason was involved.

I bet he lied for no good reason, making it harder for them to do their job.

Still, to just stand there instead of rushing over to help the person you may have amputated.

He did get absolutely launched tho. Wtf he got pneumatically operated doors or something???

Dude just flung someone to their presumed death and gave zero fucks.

Better go grab something from my car and then just stand here like a totally uninvolved bystander watching something mildly curious

The atmospheric pressure needs to be significantly higher for even pure oxygen to put you at risk of oxygen toxicity. I don’t think this graph is accurate.

I’m coming for that boatussy, fr.

The security deposit is worth it

That shuttle has a BADONK.
Gotta get me some of that shutussy

You got Streisand’ed

No, again.

I didn’t make a stance, I didn’t say they’re not that bad. I asked why everyone immediately shit on them, and then I asked for more information when your examination seemed contradictory in one area.

You keep putting words in my mouth and getting angry at me for them.

You gave me a reasonable explanation at first, and then when I asked for clarification about a part that seemed contradictory to me, I was immediately met with anger, accusations, and a repeated claim that all my questions had been answered.

Someone else actually gave me a pretty decent answer, but then they deleted their reply before I could follow up with them 😢. It was more about posturing than about economics (although when governments posture, economics are always impacted)

Ok, I see the problem; you’re not reading my replies.

I have been bending over backwards to make it clear I’m not advocating anything in general, and that I don’t support trump or his suggestion in specific.

You keep saying that you’ve explained tariffs in general, but most of what you’ve done is just assert they’re bad and then claim that you’ve explained it, but if you haven’t been reading my replies then of course you wouldn’t have read the questions I’ve asked about the explanations you did provided

You didn’t provide facts, you provided arguments and assertions.
Then I refuted one of your arguments showing how it is seemingly contradicted one of your assertions and asked for elaboration.

I don’t understand where your hostility is coming from. I’m not even saying you’re wrong, I’m pointing out arguments that don’t appear (to me) to lead to your conclusion.

I absolutely don’t refute that Trump’s idea is a bad one. My question is more general than that.

What?

Why am I getting down votes?
How am I shitting on anything? What am I even shitting on? \

All I’m doing is asking “why do we shit on teriffs and treat them as inherently bad?”
Im trying to have a discussion in good faith, and rather than having any of my questions explained or answered I’m just down voted and vaguely demeaned.

I’m being very clear I do not support whatever shit trump is doing, I’m trying to understand why people just hate tariffs.
I don’t understand how, if the importer bares all tariff costs, what would disincentivize a foreign nation from exporting to us since they bear no increased costs. Why would this not just appear as a decrease in demand, from their perspective?

Majestic af