So I took a browse through your comment history out of idle curiosity. You’re an “um actually” concern troll that just looks for things to argue about. It’s pretty obvious you don’t actually care. Maybe you shouldn’t feel satisfaction with being a contrarian assbag for entertainment.
Are you sure that wasn’t just an attempted joke about the phrase asexual reproduction?
Now it’s a Z:\bra
I’m pretty sure cow is the species common name and bull/heffer are the sex variant terms.
You know, like how a rooster and a hen are both still chickens?
They’ve left out pears, and I’ve chosen to take that as a personal insult.
I’m in my 30s, and pretty much just work and go home. I’ve got no hobbies outside the house and have never bothered pursuing a relationship. No chance in hell I’m making it to retirement age. I figure the stress of my lifestyle will grind away at my will to live and I’ll just stop eating at some point.
Yeah, the color is nice but the cut is atrocious.
The quality of the writing is questionable and the humor is juvenile, but there’s an okay story in there. I think it comes down to if you care for death games as a setting.
Is a Romano as unpleasant as it looks? I’m having a hard time understanding the appeal.
Do the French dislike honey?
Kinda sucks when you don’t drink though. Best advice I’ve heard was to take up a social hobby, but I haven’t a clue what that would be either.
Like you said, find an excuse to leave your house I guess.
None of this has a point. We’re talking over a shitpost rant about common use of math symbols. Even the conclusion boils down to it being a context dependent matter of preference. I’m just disagreeing that the original question as posed should be interpreted with weak juxtaposition.
My argument is specifically that using no separation shows intent for which way to interpret and should not default to weak juxtaposition.
Choosing not to use (6/2)(1+2) implies to me to use the only other interpretation.
There’s also the difference between 6/2(1+2) and 6/2*(1+2). I think the post has a point for the latter, but not the former.
Honestly, I do disagree that the question is ambiguous. The lack of parenthetical separation is itself a choice that informs order of operations. If the answer was meant to be 9, then the 6/2 would be isolated in parenthesis.
Yeah I agree with that. I will, however, point out that it means basically the same thing as the word normal. Context does matter as much as being understood as meaning non-autistic.
Lol, right? It would be funny if it weren’t so depressingly common a response.
“Something bad is happening to men”
“I think we should focus on how that affects women.”
Recreational weed was on the same ballot and both passed. Ohio actually managed to do two things right, which is a pleasant change of pace.
Well RIP your sanity and free time. You’re going to wake up a few weeks from now after having nightmares about unsaturated belts.
I’d be worried that this will be used as a screen to kill “undesirables” without scrutiny.
A wealthy man from Soth Africa has weird views on eugenics? I’m shocked!