TheEntity

You cannot let or forbid a 16yo to use stuff. You can only decide whether they will do it in the open or in hiding. Personally I’d rather have them talk to me about it than hide it from me.

Whether it works or not, this looks incredibly fun! That’s a win in my book.

I’m still confused why people are so hell bent on using a single window exclusively. It’s a natural way to group the tabs and it was there from day one!

I do not have a contract with you and I do not consent to paddling off these two hours of my life I’m never getting back.

The source got pulled off Github already.

them trying to get out of ever having kids

As if it was a bad thing. Or the doctor’s decision for that matter. If they don’t want to have kids, it’s well within their right to keep it this way.

The only thing we know without a proof is that they might be doing it. We don’t have a proof they do it but we also don’t have any proof they are incapable of doing so. A reasonable course of action would be to take precautions against it while not condemning them either, until they are either proven actually guilty or actively unwilling to up their security, which would also strongly imply the former.

Until it’s proven the data is E2E encrypted, it’s a fair assumption it can be read by a 3rd party, either now or in the future. E2EE is the only proof that matters, everything else is just a corporate “trust me bro”.

Looks like a boring update but being boring is kinda the thing I appreciate in GNOME. It’s all about expectations.

I’m sure we can compromise on a mandatory database of registered AI-generated content that only the corporations can read from but everyone using AI-generated content is required by law to write to, with hefty fines (but only for regular people).

Single tweets are rarely useful without being able to read some context that isn’t visible without logging in.

Looks like Nvidia to me.

The same could be said about any game with any non-Steam availability. I don’t think that was OP’s intent. That being said, emulators surely were not the intent either.

It still needs a phone number for registration. You just don’t need to share it with people you want to talk with.

But wouldn’t a case do exactly what you want? It would make the damn thing thicker and flat on the back.

Making quality tools due to long-standing processes is definitely a different breed of tradition than oppressing minorities because they don’t fit someone’s “traditional” worldview.

To better illustrate my first post: The Victorinox craft isn’t high quality because it’s a tradition. It became a tradition because it’s high quality. If we subtract it being a tradition, we still have a reason to keep making it this way. The same cannot be said about oppressing people, unless one literally views human suffering as value added.

I just dislike the military way of doing… everything. So not surprising this part annoys me too.

I think there is some confusion between tradition and well-tested processes. I’d hardly consider creating quality products a tradition.

Still not a name. “My name is John Smith and I’m a staff sergeant” is fine. “My name is Staff Sergeant Smith” is just silly and makes a person look full of themselves.

If he’s being a putin stooge because it’s good for his business, he’s still being a putin stooge.