Fun facts: the UK has crazy laws protecting trees and hedgerows. There’s a national tree registry for old boys.

  • fossilesqueOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We should really have representatives for non humans in government that are meant to function at an economic loss/investment as a way of giving back. Too often these departments get pushed to deliver ecosystem services. We need to learn to give back without it being transactional. Make gift culture great again. Elect a Lorax.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s called environmental protection groups, animal rights groups, etc. Plenty don’t want to listen, though

      • fossilesqueOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean literally representatives like senators not interest groups.

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Who is going to keep them accountable? Trees have a record high abstention rate, and if these representatives are elected by humans that’s just proportional voting with veneer on top.

          Democracy is about balancing levers, and that’s why there is more than one branch of government. Special interest groups do have power, and so does the judiciary (who may sue the government for unlawful cutting down of trees) and the executive (who may have power to declare certain government-owned land to be Protected).

          The real ecologist move would be to write a duty to protect the environment into the constitution, so that the judiciary can strike down any law that does anything to the contrary.

          • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I believe at least one state—Wyoming, maybe—has a guarantee in its constitution that citizens will have a clean and healthy environment, or something along those lines. It effectively creates a duty to protect the environment.

            Edit: it’s Montana.

            • Almrond@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I was going to say, definitely not Wyoming. Too many oil and gas companies absolutely destroy the areas they are in. I lived in Edgerton for a bit, there is literally no potable water in town, you will make yourself incredibly sick drinking out of the tap because of the drilling in the area. That’s just one of very many examples.

    • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would argue most things in government should be ran in the black or red. There’s just a certain type of person who wants to turn everything Into a for profit.

      • fossilesqueOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes thank you. This is more helpful than you realise.