A lazy cat in human skin, an eldritch being borne of the '90s.
deleted by creator
Comedically evil is the correct nomenclature, I believe.
deleted by creator
I have heard irl from a few of us who moved out of the us, that they are now going out of their way to register to vote. So, that is a lot of hope, anecdotally.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/1999/aug/24/spaceexploration
He was “prolific.”
I see it as a paradox. :) I don’t like calling them trees. I just call them palms.
I did and I agree with the author. You do not have to agree with us. It’s a form vs function argument. There is not a “right absolute” answer, it’s about how you approach the question.
A third excuse for pi, you say? I think it suits it.
Mmmmm, I’d say specialists would not use the broader definitions that are more colloquial in nature. Language depends on the user and their purpose/intent. Generally, trees are woody plants with secondary growth and they aren’t monocots. It’s not a hard boundary, but really depends on context.
I’d say about 69.
https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2018/06/inside-the-world-of-global-tax-havens-and-offshore-banking-damgaard
This is old data. The well of souls being hoarded is inconceivable.
https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/