Hello Lemmings!

I am thinking of making a community moderation bot for Lemmy. This new bot will have faster response times with the help of Lemmy webhooks, an amazing plugin for Lemmy instances by @rikudou@lemmings.world to add webhook support. With this, there is no need to frequently call the API at a fixed interval to fetch new data. Any new data will be sent via the webhook directly to the bot backend. This allows for actions within seconds, thus making it an effective auto moderation tool.

I have a few features I thought of doing:

  • Welcome messages
  • Auto commenting on new posts
  • Scheduled posts
  • Punish content authors or take action on Auto report content via word blacklist/regex
  • Ban members of communities by their usernames via word blacklist or regex
  • Auto community lockdown during spam

What other features do you think are possible? Please let me know. Any questions are also welcome.

Community requested features:

  • Strike system

Strikes are added to a certain member of the community and the member will be temporarily banned within a time period if their strike count reaches a certain threshold

  • Post creation restriction by account age

If an account’s age is lower than X, remove the post.

  • Lvxferre
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    Trying to automate things and decrease mod burden is great, so I don’t oppose OP’s idea on general grounds. My issues are with two specific points:

    • Punish content authors or take action on content via word blacklist/regex
    • Ban members of communities by their usernames/bios via word blacklist or regex
    1. Automated systems don’t understand what people say within a context. As such, it’s unjust and abusive to use them to punish people based on what they say.
    2. This sort of automated system is extra easy to circumvent for malicious actors, specially since they need to be tuned in a way that lowers the amount of false positives (unjust bans) and this leads to a higher amount of false negatives (crap going past the radar).
    3. Something that I’ve seen over and over in Reddit, that mods here will likely do in a similar way, is to shift the blame to automod. “NOOOO, I’m not unjust. I didn’t ban you incorrectly! It was automod lol lmao”

    Instead of those two I think that a better use of regex would be an automated reporting system, bringing potentially problematic users/pieces of content to the attention of human mods.

    • asudox@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Alright. Sounds fair. Instead of taking dangerous actions, I’ll make it create a report instead. Though I’ll probably keep the feature to punish members by their usernames via regex or word blacklist.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Though I’ll probably keep the feature to punish members by their usernames via regex or word blacklist.

        This right here is the attitude that I have a problem with. I can think of one user who would get blacklisted right away because of their username alone. And that does not sit right with me.

      • Lvxferre
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Alright. Sounds fair. Instead of taking dangerous actions, I’ll make it create a report instead.

        Thank you! Frankly, if done this way I’d be excited to use it ASAP.