“We believe the prerequisite for meaningful diplomacy and real peace is a stronger Ukraine, capable of deterring and defending against any future aggression,” Blinken said in a speech in Finland, which recently became NATO’s newest member and shares a long border with Russia.

  • Tretiak
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Dude, do you honestly think Putin is trying to militarily annihilate Ukraine? Especially when he considers Russians and Ukrainians to share the same cultural lineage and history. He made numerous overtures to try and ‘avoid’ a conflict from breaking out. Why was the west so adamantly against laying the framework for a security arrangement that made sense for all the parties involved?

    • DarraignTheSane
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 months ago

      He made numerous overtures to try and ‘avoid’ a conflict from breaking out.

      Putin: “If you allow this country to have protection from me invading it, I’m going to invade it.”
      U.S.: “Yeah… we’re going to consider allowing them protection from you.”
      Putin: “Oh no… somebody stop me from invading this other country…! Here I go, I’m gonna invaaaade…”
      U.S.: “Okay.”
      [Putin invades Ukraine, begins murdering Ukrainians]
      U.S., months later: “Alright that’s enough, we’re going to help these Ukranians to keep you from murdering them.”
      Putin and his sheep: “tHe U.S. iS wArMoNgErInG!!!1!!”

      • Tretiak
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 months ago

        What do you think the Minsk Accords were?

          • ☭ Comrade Pup Ivy 🇨🇺
            link
            fedilink
            English
            811 months ago

            Is that what we arw calling a peace treaty Ukraine violated that garanteed the righta of the Russian speaking minority of Ukrainians in donbas?

            • DarraignTheSane
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -511 months ago

              I honestly don’t give a shit. Russia is the aggressor who invaded and massacred untold Ukrainians along the way. They now should be opposed and driven back until they come to their senses and leave, or are beaten into the dust so that they can no longer pose a threat.

              If you want to debate the entire history of the region, take it to someone who does give a shit.

              • Tretiak
                link
                fedilink
                English
                711 months ago

                “I have strong opinions about something I don’t know shit about!”

                • ☭ Comrade Pup Ivy 🇨🇺
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  611 months ago

                  I do not think I have heard a better summation of the liberal point of view on this topic. Though I would add a very infront of the strong

                  • krolden
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    011 months ago

                    How about “war and people dying is bad, but…”

              • ☭ Comrade Pup Ivy 🇨🇺
                link
                fedilink
                English
                411 months ago

                Quick question, how can Russia be the agressor, when they were not the party to break the previous treaty? How could Russia be the agressor when they only entered after their allies, the LPR and DPR, newly formed after a vote of the people due to the violation of the aformentioned Minsk Accords, asked for help from their ally. Russia never took the first step, and its quite hard to be the agressor when, you where not the one agressing

        • @JasBC@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          Non-binding treaties negotiated under duress that all fell apart the moment the ink was put to paper, through which Russia tried to control Ukrainian internal affairs?