What is and isn’t good science changes with changes in metascience (the science of science); which is also why it’s important to keep current with the literature, especially in today’s world. Philosophy and History of Science are fields that are having an exciting little boom right now with tonnes of great researchers and lay books.
(As an aside, I use wiki a lot for a quick jumping off point as I trust it a bit more after I started editing it; they do try their best and are vigilant and passionate.)
I like this guy from Durham in particular: https://markrubin.substack.com/ - he’s got some cool links in the about section, but his stuff is a little technical. Nice dude.
What is and isn’t good science changes with changes in metascience (the science of science); which is also why it’s important to keep current with the literature, especially in today’s world. Philosophy and History of Science are fields that are having an exciting little boom right now with tonnes of great researchers and lay books.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_science?wprov=sfla1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_science_and_technology?wprov=sfla1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_science?wprov=sfla1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historiography_of_science?wprov=sfla1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metascience?wprov=sfla1
(As an aside, I use wiki a lot for a quick jumping off point as I trust it a bit more after I started editing it; they do try their best and are vigilant and passionate.)
This guy set in motion a lot of current practices of “good science:” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Popper?wprov=sfla1
I like this guy from Durham in particular: https://markrubin.substack.com/ - he’s got some cool links in the about section, but his stuff is a little technical. Nice dude.