☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Share Funny Videos, Images, Memes, Quotes and more @lemmy.mlEnglish · 9 months agoGermans be likelemmy.mlimagemessage-square547fedilinkarrow-up1469arrow-down167
arrow-up1402arrow-down1imageGermans be likelemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Share Funny Videos, Images, Memes, Quotes and more @lemmy.mlEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square547fedilink
minus-squareThe Octonautlinkfedilinkarrow-up35arrow-down4·9 months agoYou can put nuclear waste in a box and decide what to do with it later. CO² is less helpful that way.
minus-squareHestia [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down2·9 months agoAnd unlike my bills, it becomes less dangerous the longer you ignore them.
minus-squaredangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·edit-29 months agoWe already have carbon storing technology. Also, you wanted subscript for the 2.
minus-squareThe Octonautlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·9 months agoI didn’t say we didn’t have carbon storing technology, but if you aren’t aware that it’s more difficult to recapture carbon than to put spent fuel in a box, you probably should read past the first paragraph of whatever Wikipedia article you found.
minus-squarethreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months agoNo no no, they definitely meant “carbon monoxide squared”.
You can put nuclear waste in a box and decide what to do with it later. CO² is less helpful that way.
And unlike my bills, it becomes less dangerous the longer you ignore them.
We already have carbon storing technology. Also, you wanted subscript for the 2.
I didn’t say we didn’t have carbon storing technology, but if you aren’t aware that it’s more difficult to recapture carbon than to put spent fuel in a box, you probably should read past the first paragraph of whatever Wikipedia article you found.
No no no, they definitely meant “carbon monoxide squared”.