• shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I would also go mad if I had to accept that 83 is a prime number but 1 isn’t

        • shneancy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          what i’m mad about is that you can divide by infinity and get zero, but you can’t divide by 0 and get infinity. make up your minds maths people

          • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Oh you totally can (as long as you’re working with implied limits, which you have to if infinity is in the mix), you just have to specify if it’s a positive or negative zero.

              • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                i mean, implicitly it’s just whether you’re approaching zero from positive or negative direction, since we’re working with limits.

                Like you can shave down a stick however much you want, you can never reach 0 stick by doing so.

          • Wugmeister@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I typed up a very angry paragraph about how you can’t divide by infinity either because infinity is a function within the context of algebraic math, then I realized I was wrong, which made me step back and realize how fucky it is that the only number that is weirder than 0 isn’t in fact a number