Anytime anyone posts a scantily clad person or nude photo it must be marked nsfw out of respect for people who view the site at home with kids around or at work. I saw some photos recently of half naked chicks not marked nsfw, in my nudity room all posts are matked in this way amd i think going forward this should be our website policy and breaking the rule results in three warnings then a ban if fuckery continues

  • Spotted_Lady@wolfballs.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    I get you on that.

    And what about cartoon nudity? Still NSFW, right? That said, Wikipedia uses such images to depict the topics. Like if you look up fellatio. That has a cartoon image depicting it. They’ve mulled over ways to detect IPs in certain places and hide the images by default for them.

    • Esperantist@wolfballs.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      If we just go strictly by the initialism, drawn sexual images even if not pornographic don’t seem like the kind of thing that’d be safe to look at at work. Seems fitting to give them an NSFW tag.

      • goldenballs@wolfballs.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Wilipedia pages of sexual related things are the borderline of that and medical diagrams. The question should always be “Why are you accessing at that at work?” That test applies to textual content as well images and some sounds or music. Not all workplace/country cultures are the same.