Communities around the U.S. have seen shootings carried out with weapons converted to fully automatic in recent years, fueled by a staggering increase in small pieces of metal or plastic made with a 3D printer or ordered online. Laws against machine guns date back to the bloody violence of Prohibition-era gangsters. But the proliferation of devices known by nicknames such as Glock switches, auto sears and chips has allowed people to transform legal semi-automatic weapons into even more dangerous guns, helping fuel gun violence, police and federal authorities said.

The (ATF) reported a 570% increase in the number of conversion devices collected by police departments between 2017 and 2021, the most recent data available.

The devices that can convert legal semi-automatic weapons can be made on a 3D printer in about 35 minutes or ordered from overseas online for less than $30. They’re also quick to install.

“It takes two or three seconds to put in some of these devices into a firearm to make that firearm into a machine gun instantly,” Dettelbach said.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    This reads like pig-induced hysterics.

    I’m not anti-gun myself, but there are far better arguments for the anti-gun crowd to use than this.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Calling a modified handgun a machine gun is some pretty impressive hyperbole, yeah.

      • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean it’s a gun that fires continuously with a single trigger pull. How is that not a machine gun? Yeah it’s a machine pistol that’ll spend a clip in 3 seconds, but it’s still a machine gun.

        • KuraiWolfGaming@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          A machine gun, traditionally, is a fully automatic firearm in a rifle format.

          Think light machine guns (M249, PKM) or a sub-machine gun (MP5, P90)

          A machine pistol isn’t technically a “machine gun” despite the name. In fact, the classification of machine pistols is a debated topic even now.

          In many places, they are classified as any other pistol. In others, they considered a form of PDW or Personal Defense Weapon.

          But, PDW can sometimes refer to a specific class of SMG like the P90. Basically, a compact firearm with a cartridge around 6mm or so. Which the P90 fires a 5.7mm round.

          Its complicated. And we should not be painting all firearms with the same brush.

          • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’m glad there’s at least one person standing up for the fair and humane treatment of murder weapons.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          An automatic rifle in full-auto will spend its magazine just as fast. Which is why burst mode exists.

        • harderian729@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s an automatic pistol…

          “Machine” doesn’t mean automatic, lol.

          Just use words for what they are instead of trying to replace them for shock value.

          I don’t expect you to do this, though.

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Are raspberry Pis not computers because they’re tiny?

            Are small electric cars not cars because they can only carry two people?

            Are cube satellites not satellites because they’re tiny?

            If I’m being fired at rapidly, I’ll be saying “help, someone is shooting at me with a machine gun!” It would be funny if someone popped in and said “ackshually…”

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Do you really think that if everyone learns precise technical gun terms that gun control arguments will change?

            • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              No, but it means there can be a discussion where each side is able to communicate effectively.

              Words have meaning. If we are to have a stark discussion, at the beginning we need to come to agreement on what words mean so that either side does not misunderstand each other.

              • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Adapting your own language to your audience is a thing. It’s like if you speak to room of professionals, you will use the common professional language. Yet speaking to the general public you will use a language that is generally understood.

                But trying to force the general public to understand professional language should be a lesson in futility.

                The onus is on you to understand and speak to your audience. Don’t blame them for your lack in that.

            • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              It’s important to call things what they are. I know of magazine capacity laws written so poorly they dont even touch belt fed weapons and for the low low price of 1500 bucks you can convert the AR you already have into a belt fed weapon and constantly fire rounds until you run out of belt or the guns melts. And that’s just a part called the upper reciever which legally is not a gun. You can get it shipped online no questions asked, no checks required. Knowing what you’re talking about makes a difference. This is how loopholes get made.

            • KuraiWolfGaming@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              It would certainly help.

              What is the point in making up terms for firearms that have never been used for them even by the military?

              It only serves to muddy the waters and scare people.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                I’m pretty sure the massive amount of gun violence is what scares people, not terms that aren’t used by the military.

                In fact, from what I’ve seen, the people who really care about technical terms are the ones who want to find them to get around gun regulations or stop them from happening in the first place.

                I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been told that there’s no such thing as an assault weapon when there was an assault weapon ban in law, meaning there clearly is whether or not some people don’t accept that as a technically valid term.

                • KuraiWolfGaming@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  The term “assault weapon” is being used by people who know nothing about firearms to refer to anything that isn’t an old bolt action these days.

                  Its meaningless

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    And yet “assault weapons” were still banned. So it sounds like it worked out until that ban expired.

          • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s an automatic pistol…

            “Machine” doesn’t mean automatic, lol.

            So this is the problem of knowing the actual jargon vs the natural language people use.

            Jargon is often prescriptive and needs to be taught. A word means a specific thing because people who know the subject well use it to describe that thing.

            But natural language doesn’t work that way. You’ll note that the dictionary definition for “machine gun” includes “broadly: an automatic weapon.” Dictionaries have to be “descriptive,” because they’re helping someone understand what an average person means when they say a phrase.

            There are countless examples of words beginning to mean other things in natural language. My pet peeve example is the fact that “podium,” a word containing the root meaning “foot” that is clearly about a raised platform one stands on, in the dictionary contains “see lectern.” Because a fuckload of people (especially in North America) call lecterns “podiums.”

            Anyway my point here is that the average person considers any automatic weapon a “machine gun.” That may not be the technical definition of “machine gun,” but it is the natural definition. So when people use it to describe an automatic handgun they aren’t doing this for “shock value,” they’re doing it because they don’t know any better and because to them, that’s what the word they’re using means.

          • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            The comparison I use for these conversion devices is it’s like putting high-octane fuel in a dodge caravan and calling it an F1 racer.

            • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Nobody is saying that putting “faster” bullets into a gun makes it fully automatic (or a machine gun) so your example is silly at best.

              This is about 3D printables that fundamentally change the speed at which a gun chamber/clip can be emptied.

              Do better.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                a gun chamber/clip

                I’ve seen so many people get absurdly upset if you misnomer the place in the gun where the bullets go.

                Incidentally, these same people hate pronouns.

                • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Gun owner, pedant, and father of a trans man here. Did you just make a bigoted assumption?

                  It’s a shibboleth.

                  The distinction is simple, straightforward, widely taught, broadly known. Using it correctly is an immediate indication that one has acquired some very basic knowledge of the subject matter. Using it incorrectly is an immediate indication that they have not.

                  If someone with a gun calls it a “clip”, I am immediately wary. They haven’t learned very much about guns, and certainly not from responsible instructors. They might have a gun in their possession, but they haven’t proved they are gun owners. Until I can determine their skill level, I won’t be turning my back on them.

                  A “magazine” charges the firearm; a “clip” charges the magazine.

                  That’s it. That’s the distinction. A magazine puts ammunition into the action of the gun, where it is fed into the chamber and fired. A clip is used to put ammunition into the magazine, where it waits to be fed into the action.

                  It is one tiny little factoid about guns that immediately demonstrates the speaker’s familiarity - or ignorance - of the subject matter. It is a shortcut toward determining their credibility.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            “Machine” doesn’t mean automatic, lol.

            Machines are devices that leverage physical forces to some desirable effect. Strictly speaking, all guns are machine guns

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s not an anti-gun argument.

      The theory is that you CAN’T regulate guns because people will just 3D print inferior copies.

      • figjam@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ding ding. "3d printers must be regulated for safety and copyright protection "

        • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Go to home depot and you can make a pipe shotgun that doesn’t even require welding to make. A lot of fully 3d printed guns are 9mm. If you havent shot both cartridges I cannot explain the difference between 9mm and a shotgun slug. Maybe it will suffice to say the bulletproof vests that stop 9mm, when hit with a shotgun slug often result in broken ribs, punctured lungs, and general chest cave ins. Your 3d printed gun will undoubtedly have better rate of fire but in terms of accuracy and level of destruction, the shotgun will compete just fine.

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ding ding. "3d printers must be regulated for safety and copyright protection "

          But that’s impossible, not figuratively, but literally. 3d printers are devices designed for hobbiest-hackers you can’t put copy protection or drm controls on a device like that, it won’t work. If any legislation were passed to make that happen, there will be open source alternative firmware for these devices the very next day, months before the legislation would even take effect.

          That is in other words, a waste of effort. The genie is out of the bottle and it can’t be put back in. The question is what will we do now that it’s out.