My suggestion is to sell them to Ben Shapiro

  • Sabata11792@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    178
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ron Guilmette, whose tennis court was destroyed in previous storms along the beach, added that he now doesn’t know how much his property is worth or if he will stay in the area. He calls the situation on Salisbury Beach “catastrophic.” “I don’t know what the solution is,”

    Oh no, not your tennis court. What a shame. What a darn tragic loss for our nobility. Oh why can’t the climate adjust to save your beachfront home. How could the earth be so inconsiderate for our rich land owners.

      • Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Just one sentence.

        Ron Guilmette, whose tennis court was destroyed in previous storms along the beach, added that he now doesn’t know how much his property is worth or if he will stay in the area.

        Not home - property implying one of many, and be owns his own private beach tennis court… But I mean I guess it could’ve been two words:

        Ron, Billionaire

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      To be fair a lot of these homes have been there for 50-100 years (some way older). Salisbury (and parts of Hampton just north) is relatively poor compared to much of the New England sea coast, but those look like pretty expensive homes. Just a road or 2 over is a lot lower income. lots of fishermen lived there traditionally. That part of the Atlantic coast was settled and built before the idea of public land was really well defined unlike parts of California and the west coast.

  • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I love this story. From people banding together and building a sand barrier on the beach to stop the ocean. To the idea that they MUST know sandbags exist but they never considered why people don’t just skip the bags and dump sand, to not one person mentioning climate change or sea level increase even though that’s clearly the problem, to the one guy saying “it’s mother nature you just have to accept it”. 5 stars, would deny climate change and fix the problem with sand piles again.

    • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      9 months ago

      The best part is that their previous sand dune was removed by storms and high tides in 2022, so their solution was to build another sand dune, which took a year, and was immediately removed by storms and high tides.

      You can’t make this shit up.

      • deus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        9 months ago

        When I first came here, this was all beach. Everyone said I was daft to build a house on a beach, but I built in all the same, just to show them. It sank into the ocean. So I built a second one. That sank into the ocean. So I built a third. That burned down, fell over, then sank into the ocean. But the fourth one stayed up. And that’s what you’re going to get, Lad, the strongest house in all of the coast.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      9 months ago

      You just know they went for sand piles because they didn’t want to ruin their beachfront with more stable constructions.

  • FollyDolly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t know why, but this made me laugh so hard. They thought they could keep the ocean at bay with a big pile of sand. Oh my sweet summer child.

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    9 months ago

    I have no sympathy for anyone that builds close to water. It will ALWAYS win. I will never understand people who don’t take these things into account when buying a safe place to sleep.

    • Lath@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      9 months ago

      They saw Netherlands and said “Fuck it, we can do it better!”, then promptly failed.

        • pro_user@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Exactly! Dutch dunes are mostly natural: beach sand is blown onto the land and started to pile up, eventually forming dunes. Even in the places where there are buildings facing the sea, they are at least 100(‘s) meters away from the coastline.

          The man-made dikes are much more than just a pile of sand. To quote wikipedia:

          Artificial levees require substantial engineering. Their surface must be protected from erosion, so they are planted with vegetation such as Bermuda grass in order to bind the earth together. On the land side of high levees, a low terrace of earth known as a banquette is usually added as another anti-erosion measure. On the river side, erosion from strong waves or currents presents an even greater threat to the integrity of the levee. The effects of erosion are countered by planting suitable vegetation or installing stones, boulders, weighted matting, or concrete revetments. Separate ditches or drainage tiles are constructed to ensure that the foundation does not become waterlogged.

          Source

    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      I absolutely love being near (or on, or in) bodies of water. But I figured out that I would never want to live near one before I hit my teens.

  • protist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Did they just dump sand in a big pile? Sand dunes are pretty well-understood ecosystems that require something underneath to anchor to as well as plants on top to stabilize them.

    But also, the ocean is going to continue to rise, so any effort is likely futile. Sorry about that dude’s tennis court getting ruined

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, you misread. They said you need something underneath the sand dunes to stabilize them. So they need to dump a bunch of sand on top of the guy’s tennis court and that’ll do the trick.

  • xapr@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Here’s another good one: The city of Long Beach, California spends close to that much every year to do the same thing to protect mansions built on a sand bar (the Long Beach Peninsula) that are about 50 feet from the water line on a good day. They just keep constantly moving sand from one end of the beach to the other end a couple miles away. That’s city money. The article below has some details, but only refers to the city saving $100k to $300k a year by bringing the work in house. The figure I’ve heard is more like $500k a year. I imagine it’s actually higher than that, even. They have dedicated big earth movers, a built facility to store and maintain them, employees dedicated to it, etc. Do the math. This is probably happening all over the country and all over the world.

    https://www.presstelegram.com/2022/12/19/long-beach-moves-its-own-beach-sand-to-protect-peninsula/

  • DigitalFrank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    So the natural dunes washed away and the answer was to replace sand with…sand.

    Reminds me of the castle built in the swamp bit.

  • symthetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Better yet, put Ben Shapiro in the dune. His gish galloping repugnance should hold back the ocean no problem. If not, well…

  • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why are they all confounded? Pretty sure they all have insurance that will cover everything. Wealthy people with beach houses have money. Money can solve any problem.

    • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      9 months ago

      Insurance will say they will cover everything, except these very specific things which you can apply to most scenarios.

      “Sorry, that’s just wear and tear on your property”

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Rich people are rich because they’re misers who hate losing money for any reaosn,and insurance companies are nothing if not profit-driven and have a million ways to weasel out. So we all enjoy the shadenfreude. Whoever loses in this case, we win.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Are you sure about that?

        Because when a bunch of rich people lose money, public funds tend to find a way to make them whole

        The system is rigged… Private gains and socialized losses. They don’t lose, no matter how dumb they play the game

  • invisiblegorilla@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Hahaha fucking idiots. No one thought about this project from inception to completion. Plenty of coastal erosion projects around the world that DIDN’T fail and this implementation, if just one person gave a shit, could’ve been a success