Drinking lead can damage people’s brains, but Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach opposes a plan to remove lead water pipes.

In their letter, the attorneys general wrote, “[The plan] sets an almost impossible timeline, will cost billions and will infringe on the rights of the States and their residents – all for benefits that may be entirely speculative.”

Kobach repeated this nearly verbatim in a March 7 post on X (formerly Twitter).

Buttigieg responded by writing, “The benefit of not being lead poisoned is not speculative. It is enormous. And because lead poisoning leads to irreversible cognitive harm, massive economic loss, and even higher crime rates, this work represents one of the best returns on public investment ever observed.”

  • elbucho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    144
    ·
    4 months ago

    So, Kobach et al’s complaint is that the plan to replace lead pipes is underfunded and so probably won’t cause enough of an impact on lead levels in drinking water to even bother, and yet the reason it’s underfunded is because Republicans specifically voted to not fund it properly. So instead of funding it 100% (or close to 100%), they chose to only fund about 1/3rd of what it would cost to replace all of the lead pipes.

    It almost seems like Republicans want potential voters to imbibe neurotoxins that will negatively impact their IQ, harm their ability to concentrate, and make them more easily swayed by emotional appeals. I wonder why that could be?

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Since they were only given 1/3 of the budget, they should announce that they’ll only be removing lead from low income districts (which the Republicans have red-lined into being largely black neighborhoods). See if fomo changes their minds.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        It won’t change their minds, because they already think it’s not their problem. Their water doesn’t have lead, they presume.

    • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      It almost seems like Republicans want potential voters to imbibe neurotoxins that will negatively impact their IQ, harm their ability to concentrate, and make them more easily swayed by emotional appeals. I wonder why that could be?

      This is my tin foil hat explanation. Also poor areas with more black and ethnic minority people are more likely to have lead pipes and it leads to increased crime and violence, thus further stoking racial tensions and increasing support for racist policy and therefore republicans

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Recognizing that Republicans are monsters who will do literally anything for power doesn’t require any paranoia, just observation.

    • Olivia@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      It almost seems like Republicans want potential voters to imbibe neurotoxins that will negatively impact their IQ, harm their ability to concentrate, and make them more easily swayed by emotional appeals.

      It’s probably that they’re reaching for straws on anything they can complain about. Which works when their lower iq voters see that there is controversy.