• InappropriateEmote [comrade/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s not obvious? Because white males as a demographic are the most privileged people on the planet and not coincidentally also the ones most prone to petty, oblivious arrogance, tantrum-throwing, and egotistical man-splaining. The latter was demonstrated by the one in this NASA scientist’s anecdote.

    • Dra@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This robs people of their individual context. The UK Prime Ministers wife is Indian and astonishingly privileged. You are suggesting a poor mine worker from Romania is somehow more privileged based on how he looks.

      Lumping people into loose categories (particularly based on skin colour) and then prescribing loose values to them is fascist and racist.

      • DinosaurThussy [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        You are suggesting a poor mine worker from Romania is somehow more privileged based on how he looks.

        You misunderstand the concept of privilege. It’s not linear. Intersectionality was devised to solve this exact contradiction.

          • The_Jewish_Cuban [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Intersectionality is the idea that various forms of privilege and circumstance interact with each other to make an individual. Certain influences are more impactful upon a particular person’s circumstances, and thus influence privilege to a much greater extent. The non-linear nature that DinosaurThussy is talking about can better be shown with examples.

            If you’re homeless and white it’s clear that you’re in a worse off situation than a billionaire who is black. Class status has a far greater influence on this situation. It would be fair to say that the black billionaire has more privilege due to his class status but not his ethnic identity. That being said, it’s unlikely that the white man was denied a job due to his race in a way a homeless black person may be. Being poor and white and poor and black have many commonalities, but intersectional analysis allows us to understand the different ways and avenues that particular characteristics influences the ways that a person may end up in a particular circumstance.

            The idea continues on. A person who is a billionaire may be significantly shielded from a lot of racism, or face it in a less extreme way. For example, that proverbial black billionaire likely wouldn’t have many run ins with racist cops in impoverished neighborhoods. However, he still might face the unifying characteristic of being called a slur by his peers in the way that a poor black person might. His privilege of wealth may not complete inoculate him facing racism at all, even if he faces it in a less extreme way.

            In essence, this situation is viewing individuals dialectic-ly. It seeks to understand how all of a person’s identity and circumstances relate to the struggles and oppression certain groups or people may face in society.

            • Dra@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              8 months ago

              I empathise with most of this and thank you for bothering to respond without resorting to 4chan energy.

              The problem that remains unresolved is the refusal of some people to acknowledge that, like in science, observation is not without cost. What ends up happening is the observation of these trends then causes casualties of blame - in your example we could say the huge population of white people who dont fundamentally see black people in any light other than equal. An insult based on a black billionaire being a greedy billionaire gets called racially charged, when actually, it’s entirely class based. This reliably means that (for example) white working class boys/girls are left to rot.

              Personally I see most of these prejudicial issues being an exclusively American problem that has been exported abroad, to the extent now that its difficult to untangle.

                • Dra@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  America has prejudicial issues at astonishing levels compared to the rest of the developed world. Obviously its an absurd statement to say there is no predujude abroad in the western world, but the US has the controlling stake in it, and happens to be an infectious cultural juggernaut.

                  • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    17
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    happens to be

                    I wonder if there was material historical precedent that could explain this, and explain the state of the modern world?

                    Nah, systems aren’t real I forgot, nevermind

                  • yoink [she/her]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    there is literally a genocide being perpetrated by israel right now what do you mean america has prejudicial issues at astonishing levels comparatively

              • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                22
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Personally I see most of these prejudicial issues being an exclusively American problem that has been exported abroad

                Have you forgotten who colonised most of the world, including America? This is in no way an American centric issue. Racism exists in most countries on earth.

              • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                22
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                This is what happens when you view the world through liberal idealism instead of doing any material analysis whatsoever

                Systems aren’t real, they’re just imaginary, they can’t hurt you, there’s no such thing as systemic oppression just a few bad apples

                Lmfao shut up

          • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            For example, just because a queer person is white does not mean they experience the same privilege as a cis het white person

            Or how all women are oppressed, but the tribulations of white women are Not the same as those facing women of color or trans women, they face more and more varied forms of discrimination, but it doesn’t mean that one is more important or valid than others, just materially different for example

          • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            That poor mine worker is still in a better position than an otherwise identical minority would be in the same position.

            A poor mine worker is in a tough place but at least he wasn’t refused that job because the company doesn’t hire non white people.

            • Dra@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              8 months ago

              This exporting US culture shit has got to stop

              We aren’t talking about another mine worker. We are comparing 2 individuals with certain characteristics. You have instead decided to compare a third individual because the initial comparison made the concept break down

              Just because someone is a certain color does not prescribe to them any specific value judgement. As soon as you do that, one of those categories becomes the ongoing scapegoat for everyone’s problems, and it becomes fascist.

              • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                24
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Does it ever occur to you that for your arguments to make sense you have to strip it of all context, historical perspecrive or material reality.

                I literally didn’t say anything about the us. I’m saying that Romanian is still better off than a minority in Romania that got discriminated again.

                Any more reasons for you to smugly ignore everything everybody is repeatedly telling you.

                For people who complain about how rude we are and how we’re an echo chamber you’re being shown an incredible amount of patience for how unbearably obtuse you’re intentionally being.

                • Dra@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  This is precisely the issue that I pointed at before, in reality, not everyone of a certain demographic has an advantage over everyone else of a certain demographic. Its a stupid point to attempt to initiate change because its flawed from the start

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        This robs people of their individual context.

        Is the context not that in STEM women often face sexism?

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I honestly have to pretend that sexism in STEM is nowhere near as bad as I know it is for the sake of my own mental health. I’ve heard incredible stories of blatant sexism from colleagues and friends that I just can’t fathom

          • fossilesqueOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I’ve had to defend a close friend from repeated advances and touching, she was an engineer, he was 40 years older than her. It’s a problem. I’ve had good friends get taken advantage of by a PI. Gross. It’s the power dynamic in academia too where one person controls the career outcome of the PhD student. It’s really nuts out there. It’s getting better but that takes time and awareness. I’ve seen what the bad eggs do and they disgust me. It’s not just men, but there are a lot of cases of it.

            https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00795-1

            • Dra@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              Do you think that the Prime Ministers wife is less privileged than the Romanian miner? How would you address the discrepancy with the group prescription?

              • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                No, no one thinks that, because part of the context there is that one of the people is married to a head of state, and one is a coal miner

                You aren’t misunderstanding anything here, loser, and we aren’t dumb enough to fall for it

              • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Do you think STEM women don’t face sexism? Address what I said, not something else.

                • Dra@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  You sound inexperienced. Nothing you will say will even slightly move the needle on my intent or ability to discuss things. You can cry, wail, scream, insult, have a tantrum until you are blue in the face. It makes no difference to me. If you are willing to actually discuss something, then go for it. If you are just going to project your insecurities and view everything as a fight before it’s become one, then you are the barrier to opinions changing based on new information, and nothing else.

        • Dra@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m not deliberately mistinterpreting anything, if I don’t understand something, then explain it to me.

          Incredibly privileged of you to assume everyone else has your spoilt middle class educational background

          • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            You’re posting to a niche reddit-clone that you only could’ve reliably found out about through either reddit, twitter, or mastodon. You have access to Google, you disingenuous twit.

            • Dra@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              8 months ago

              Not relevant, it’s not my job to Google your arguments that I don’t know exist. If you wish to correct me on something, please do!

              • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                22
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                LOOK IT THE FUCK UP WHEN YOU’RE CALLED ON FUNDAMENTALLY MISUNDERSTANDING SOMETHING RATHER THAN BEING A REDDITOR PEDANT, JESUS FUCKING CHRIST DO YOU NEED TYING YOUR SHOES EXPLAINED TO YOU THE SAME WAY???

                Y’know what, since I can’t even trust you to do that right at this point, have a link for it! https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=intersectionalism

                • Dra@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Getting emotional because you are impotent to communicate your thoughts on a topic isn’t condusive to anyone understanding your point of view.

                  Now, without being unstable or abusive, please try again

                  • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    20
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    Please get fucked with your smuggard guero ass. If “emotions” make it hard for you to parse an easily-grokable concept, you might have a disorder you need to get diagnosed, you empathy-lacking toad.

                    “Dr. King’s policy was, if you are nonviolent, if you suffer, your opponent will see your suffering and will be moved to change his heart. That’s very good. He only made one fallacious assumption. In order for nonviolence to work, your opponent must have a conscience. The United States has none.” – Kwame Ture

          • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            if I don’t understand something, then explain it to me.

            ok so you have deliberately removed as many brain cells as possible from your brain, understood 07

          • Ho_Chi_Chungus [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Incredibly privileged of you to assume everyone else has your spoilt middle class educational background

            berdly-actually uhm, actually, it is in fact YOU who is the privileged one in this scenario, no I. check, and furthermore, mate

      • OftenWrong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not the “I know of this one poc that’s in a position of power and so white privilege doesn’t exist” argument lol