• drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    There are lots of ways I could see it happening. Firefox is still heavy on resources on low end systems. GPU is heavy, it has poor hwdec support on things like v4l2 last time I tried it (though they do at least support it now). They don’t push the envelope in any way. Firefox STILL doesn’t have JXL support despite safari supporting it (various forks of firefox support it thanks to patches firefox refuses to look at). HEVC support when platform support is available would be nice too. And these are just the issues off the top of my head.

    What to prioritize? all of it. They have enough resources to do so.

    • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Which browsers are better on low end systems and is there a trade-off for optimising for lower end systems?

      They have enough resources to do so.

      They actually don’t

      • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Which browsers are better on low end systems and is there a trade-off for optimising for lower end systems?

        Chromium has preformed better on every single one of my systems, from core2duo and pentium linux machines, Intel Atom machines, Old arm devices. Chromium performs better in the forms of

        They actually don’t

        They do, in their 2022 report, mozilla foundation and corporations had a large amount of both total assets and liquid cash. I’ll let the financial statement do the talking here

        They have the resources, they just actively refuse to use them for firefox.

        https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2022/mozilla-fdn-2022-fs-final-0908.pdf