‘If passed by the Senate and signed into law, the bill would broaden the legal definition of antisemitism to include the “targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity.’"

Pardon me, but what is this horseshit?

  • MrFappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    A law like this is going to have the opposite of the “intended” effect. It’s going to make people hate Jewish folk as a whole. Imagine being part of the genocidal protected class, feeling untouchable, you’re going to push those boundaries more and more until you’re universally detested.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s the goal of the Zionists. They want to make sure Israel is the only safe haven, because they don’t believe in multicultural societies like the US. Everything has to be an ethnostate. That’s why they always make deals with right wing and outright antisemetic regimes like Hungary, apartheid South Africa and Saudi Arabia.

      • MrFappy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        65
        ·
        8 months ago

        Jesus Christ, does this mean that a certain toothbrush mustachioed “camp counselor” was onto something? The thought sickens me, but things are starting to get a bit too muddied to be sure anymore.

        • DarkNightoftheSoul
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          How fucking dare you say Hitler might have been fucking onto something you fucking nazi.

            • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              The German army had to run on something… and late into the war that something certainly wasn’t food.

              • maynarkh@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Late? Early in the war, what do you think the Blitzkrieg ran on? Pervitin and Panzerschokolade, that’s what.

                Not like the Western Allies were far behind, apparently their drug of choice was Benzedrine in their “go pills”.

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            This is the only correct response. You can make comparisons to Hitler all you want but you better be damn sure you have an actual point or you’re in Nazi territory

          • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            He didn’t say that, per se.

            He said it in a manner to illustrate that Zionist thinking is disturbingly similar to Hitlers thinking.

            Anything apartheid, ethnostate is about 10 steps too close to Hitler in my opinion.

            Genocide, as well, is at least a dozen steps to close to Hitler imo.

            And for what it’s worth, I don’t see much difference between Israel and Nazi Germany at this point, just scale. And if we all just said nothin, you can be damn sure they’d do everything possible to get their numbers up to the Nazis.

            I have as much respect for Zionists as I do Nazi’s, which is to say, none. Taking a turn on top of the genocidal wheel of pain abdicates any sympathies to their past. Germany and Japan are now the more humanitarian states. If I were Jewish I’d be throwing up in my mouth reading that

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          No, why would you get that from my post? What he did consider, however, before settling on the ‘final solution’, was deporting all the Jews, but nobody would take them.

          • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            What he did consider, however, before settling on the ‘final solution’, was deporting all the Jews, but nobody would take them.

            So there’s probably an alternate timeline where Hitler created Israel to deport all the Jews‽

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          No, he loved the idea of shipping Jewish folks away. The real solution is to live peacefully with Jewish folks welcome in your communities. The way to stop those who will make ethnostates is to reject the concept of ethnostates