Victim, who was in her 50s, pronounced dead at scene in Hornchurch and the animals seized
  • li10@feddit.ukEnglish
    14617·
    7 months ago

    If my dogs ever tried to kill me, I’d just pin them both down. That’s the benefit of not having insanely powerful dogs.

    IMO you shouldn’t have a dog that you can’t physically restrain. Any dog can snap and you need to be able to physically stop them if that happens.

      • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.worldEnglish
        521·
        7 months ago

        I agree in the sense that some dog breeds aren’t necessary and are actively unhealthy for the animal and the breed should be allowed to die out removing the ability for people to be owners of those breeds, and therefore ownerless

        • morphballganon@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1620·
          7 months ago

          They said only own dogs you can overpower. That means nobody gets a St. Bernard. I don’t think St. Bernard is a breed that should die out.

        • Psychodelic@lemmy.worldEnglish
          213·
          7 months ago

          This seems nuts. Is this not an insane opinion? You want entire dog breeds to go extinct? What are your thoughts on that one governor lady? lol

          • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.worldEnglish
            111·
            7 months ago

            Yes? I am not sure I understand what is making you upset. I am not saying kill all the pitbulls, I am saying stop dog eugenics and let dogs just be dogs and love the animal that comes out. If that means that we stop having access to purebred (inbred) Pugs, so be it. Mutts are just as good doggos.

            • Psychodelic@lemmy.worldEnglish
              14·
              7 months ago

              Idk why you think I’m upset. I’m more shocked than anything.

              I would think most people tend to support conservation of different animals and whatnot, except for maybe mosquitoes (and even then I’d be hesitant). It’s also blowing my mind that you’re heavily upvoted. I had no idea some of y’all thought this way.

              That said, I’m just going to assume I don’t fully understand what you’re saying since it seems so batshit crazy to me. It’s clear this isn’t really an honest, open dialogue anyway, and that’s totally fine

              • foggenbooty@lemmy.worldEnglish
                8·
                7 months ago

                Not the OP, but let me step in. Dog breeds are something we have created as humans, they’re not wild species that need to be preserved and don’t have any effect on ecosystems.

                Dog breeding is largely negative at this point as most breeds have outlived their original use and are now seen as designer pets. We continue to breed them as there is continued demand, but quite often these breeds are so inbred that they have genetic health issues. We also oversupply and don’t fix/neuter enough, meaning there are always unwanted dogs without homes.

                I love dogs, but all of mine have been rescues and I would have no problem with the vast majority of breeds being phased out. There are still some niche cases where dogs are actually used for their breed’s purpose (dog sled, search/rescue, hunting, etc) but no, I don’t think a chihuahua or a pug should exist and would not be sad if breeders stopped producing more.

                • Psychodelic@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  1·
                  7 months ago

                  Thanks for sharing your POV. It’s definitely the first time I’ve heard something that radical about dogs, which are basically the most beloved living thing in the US, but I can somewhat understand where you’re coming from.

                  I’d definitely support making it more difficult to own a dog, but mostly because many of the dog owners I’ve met are borderline abusive to their pets (I’m mainly thinking of neglect here). I don’t think I could ever support a ban on entire breeds. That’s where it starts to seem crazy to me. Make it a felony to own a dog that bites someone or something but don’t make it a felony to simply own the dog. We don’t even have such laws for people that own guns or swords and surely those lead to more deaths/injuries than dogs.

      • littlewonder@lemmy.worldEnglish
        221·
        7 months ago

        There’s a difference between that and policies that discourage breeding, etc.

        I don’t see many people advocating to outright kill dogs. There are a ton of pits in every shelter and yet people still run backyard breeding operations or tell everyone to get a pit. The breed would be better served if we told people they were more of an advanced breed that need the right kind of owners and environment.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldEnglish
          53·
          7 months ago

          I noticed my guinea pigs have never tried to murder me. Granted in a home invasion they are pretty useless. Unless I like throw their squeaky bodies at said invader or overpower him and make him drink from the water dish as vengeance.

      • GBU_28@lemm.eeEnglish
        136·
        7 months ago

        They should require a license to own and a reason to be bred

          • GBU_28@lemm.eeEnglish
            1212·
            7 months ago

            I bet more cows are killed in a year than all shelter dogs on earth.

            So, for most folks, the “no death” argument is silly

                • morphballganon@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  13·
                  7 months ago

                  Cow farms supply food for humans. I’m not saying that’s the most ethical thing in the world, but it is done. Would dogs serve the same purpose? They would produce less, lower quality meat per head.

              • GBU_28@lemm.eeEnglish
                46·
                7 months ago

                Dogs aren’t put down for their meat, so the discussion of the acceptability of putting dogs down is not based on their meat.

                Thus, the point is about humans simply killing animals.

                This isn’t about the human imposed utility, it’s about if it’s fine for humans to decide what animals live and die. Humans don’t need beef to live, there are other foods, so humans make a human centric choice to kill cows.

                Since humans are deciding what animals.live, based purely on human wants, why would dogs be free of that assessment?

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2791·
      7 months ago

      Any dog can snap

      any animal can snap.

      I guess you don’t think people should have st. bernards or great danes? I mean, I’m not suggesting people keep wolves or lions as pets, but this bully dog fearmongering is out of control. IMHO, it’s not the breed, it’s the training and owner.

      • theareciboincident@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        7312·
        7 months ago

        breed is literally bred to increase aggression over hundreds of generations

        nooo they just look scary they’re so cuddly noooo you don’t understand

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1269·
          7 months ago

          breed is literally bred to increase aggression over hundreds of generations

          absolute bullshit, unless they’re being bred by chuds for dogfights (despicable) this is not a thing

          • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.eeEnglish
            6712·
            7 months ago

            The term “pit bull” literally refers to a type of dog that has a history of fighting in pits. It’s in their name. They are a despicable breed that people should stop breeding. You’re so close to understanding…

              • yamanii@lemmy.worldEnglish
                152·
                7 months ago

                They are being human, they want to protect their fellow humans from a violent dog breed that is disproportionately responsible for owner and family deaths.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.eeEnglish
        5610·
        7 months ago

        IMHO, it’s not the breed, it’s the training and owner.

        Your humble opinion notwithstanding, Bully dogs are demonstrably more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. It’s not some irrational fear, these dogs make up 66% of all fatal dog attacks. Pick any deceased dog attack victim, and it was a Bully or a Rottweiler that killed them.

        Training is important and can make a difference in outcomes, but the data overwhelmingly points to aggression and lethality between different dog breeds being a matter of nature more than nurture, and that Bully dogs are on the far end of both spectrums leading to the worst outcomes.

          • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.eeEnglish
            477·
            7 months ago

            This entire article, which I have seen before, strawmans the issue by pretending that a ban on breeding and adoption is supposed to instantly solve fatal dog bite issues, and that short-term data from a failed small-scale direct-enforcement program (throwing the cops at the problem) is some sort of proof that restrictions don’t work.

            The reality is that banning the breeding and adoption of pit bulls would result in a long term reduction in the breed. You can even grandfather existing pit bull owners out of the ban and avoid direct enforcement against people’s pets, because you only need 12-14 years before the majority of pitbulls in the world were born after the ban, and at that point you can just enforce the law when illegal dogs are found.

            If one breed is responsible for 66% of all fatal attacks, and you significantly decrease the number of dogs of that breed, there will be fewer fatal dog attacks. A ban absolutely would work, it just won’t feel good to condemn unwanted pit bulls to euthanasia so that other breeds can be prioritized for adoption.

            And when there is a fatal dog attack by a banned breed, we can hit the owner with murder charges since someone died in the commission of a crime.

              • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.eeEnglish
                464·
                7 months ago

                How on earth does anything I said logically conclude to “ban humans”?

                It’s like you don’t even take your own position seriously making arguments like this.

              • njm1314@lemmy.worldEnglish
                52·
                7 months ago

                With how unhinged you are and your apparent love of bulldogs I’m guessing we’re going to see a story about you being murdered by one before long.

                • mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  23·
                  7 months ago

                  bulldogs

                  whole 'nother breed than what’s being discussed here sparky. so uh, whatever. Thanks for wishing me dead, you have a good fuckin night lol.

                  what an asshole…

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        263·
        7 months ago

        If your breed requires special training to not maul you or others to death, then that just proves the point of the breed being dangerous and that it should be outlawed. But please, continue to make some more bullshit excuses.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldEnglish
          612·
          7 months ago

          If your breed requires special training to not maul you or others to death,

          where is this indicated?

          My brother/sister in dogs: 30,000ish years ago, some fucking wolf/dingo/mongrel-mutt threw their lot in with ours. We have, mutually, benefitted enormously. I love dogs and trust a lot more of them than I do humans to do the right thing. This isn’t developed anecdotally, it’s a lifetime of dogs as part of our family, and operating around working dogs in the military. They deserve our respect, and training is one part of any dog’s life that humans need to learn. Most training isn’t for the dog, it’s for the family members.

          I’d recommend anyone with any dog go through training, whether a specific program or simply to acclimate the animal to your house (where and when we go outside and who’s food is who’s etc.,) but also to train them to react and behave in awkward situations. I’ve had toddlers lurch across the room, grab my dog’s faces and and poke at their eyes - and the toddlers got licked.

          Special training? YOU SHOULD TRAIN YOUR ANIMALS PERIOD. you wouldn’t trust a cat to behave around a toddler, a dog, a parrot (nearly lost a finger meeting a white parrot once!), hells man/ma’am…

          apply some sense to it all.

          • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
            82·
            7 months ago

            where is this indicated?

            In the fact that this keeps on happening even with experienced owners.

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldEnglish
              25·
              7 months ago

              it’s putting words into my mouth, I never indicated any such thing.

              want to make a point? don’t use me as your sock puppet to do it, be adult enough to make your own assertions sport.

              • h3h3productions@reddthat.comEnglish
                21·
                7 months ago

                My brother in buddy, they weren’t putting words in your mouth. They were using outside factors to answer a question you made.

                Want to talk down to someone? How about doing it to someone without having to make erroneous assumptions and jumping the defensive gun? Be adult enough to not belittle people like this chief.

          • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.eeEnglish
            21·
            7 months ago

            The bullshit excuses part was rhetorical I think. You didn’t actually have to answer that part.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nlEnglish
      44109·
      7 months ago

      Any dog can snap

      Dishonest statement. That’s like saying “Any ceiling fan can decapitate you”. Technically true, but so extraordinarily unlikely for most breeds that you should be more worried about car crashes if you fear for your life…

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.eeEnglish
    871·
    7 months ago

    me not knowing the breed looks them up via DDG

    So she was basically mauled by the Demon Dogs from Ghostbusters.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldEnglish
    707·
    7 months ago

    and the two registered dogs were safely seized having been contained inside a room, a spokesperson for the Metropolitan police said.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.worldEnglish
    487·
    7 months ago

    If she was unable to control them, she should not have gotten permission to own them in the first place.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.caEnglish
      632·
      7 months ago

      Definitely think owning dogs should require a license and a test of some sort like driving a vehicle.

      Can’t control a 120lb dog? Class B license instead of Class A license.

      Only allowed to buy dogs under 100lbs.

      Don’t understand how feeding and training works? No license for you.

      Licenses for being able to own non-fixed animals as well. Being able to breed dogs and cats needs to come with way more responsibility as well.

  • liquidparasyte@pawb.socialEnglish
    4814·
    7 months ago

    I wonder if Lemmy will be any more Normal about dogs than snoosite was

    Update: prognosis is not looking good

      • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.eeEnglish
        103·
        7 months ago

        There is at least an entire sub dedicated to hating on pit bulls. I think multiple subs. During its time a few years ago, one specific sub could make it to the top of r/all with 10,000+ upvotes.

        Reddit really doesn’t like pit bulls.

      • Addv4@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1932·
        7 months ago

        “All pits are violent and will maul any passing child.” It was pretty annoying.

        • TheFrirish@jlai.luEnglish
          377·
          7 months ago

          pitbulls are disproportionately predisposed to all kinds of violence/mauling. Even though it’s not their fails since they were specifically bred for that purpose.

        • LastElemental@lemmy.worldEnglish
          77·
          7 months ago

          I should remind my pitbull of that fact then. He’s super sweet around children, guess he forgot to attack them all this time 🤷‍♂️

          • Addv4@lemmy.worldEnglish
            62·
            7 months ago

            Not against pits (have a sweet 5 year old brindle boxer-pit mix myself), just was indicating what a lot of redditors basically would basically say whenever the whole idea of pits was brought up, and how I was almost always annoyed by it because it was in the realm of absolutes (pit mixes can be aggressive, but in fairness I’ve seen a few traditionally easy breeds be super aggressive). Apparently that seems to have been continued on lemmy as well. For reference, I’m talking about someone posting a vid or a pic of a pit mix doing something cute or innocuous and then one of the top comments would be how violent pits are.

            • Crashumbc@lemmy.worldEnglish
              11·
              7 months ago

              It would never happen, the same as if I owned any other large breed. I would take extra care with my dog around anyone.

              Note: My girl has never even looked at anything angrily, she will aggressively sniff you though!

    • Destide@feddit.ukEnglish
      912·
      7 months ago

      Refreshing to see actual discussion rather than the trite copy and paste “oh gee whizz I wonder what the breed it” posts

    • Meeech@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2842·
      7 months ago

      I can absolutely tell you the pitbull hate has arrived. I have 3 wonderful pits who adore our 10yr and 6yr niece and nephew. They cuddle up with them like teddy bears everytime they come over but according to people here, they want to maul the kids faces off…

      How people can’t understand that it’s not the dog, it’s the trainer and environment the dog is brought up in.

        • Shaggy1050@lemmy.worldEnglish
          79·
          7 months ago

          Or the opposite. I have had 2 rescues that have been amazing. The second has been a ton of work but it’s well worth it because he is one of the most loving and affectionate dogs I have ever met. I also believe that not just anyone should own a bully breed (or many other breeds of dogs for that matter).

          In my neighborhood, it’s 2 Golden’s that are always running free and wreaking havoc on other dogs and people. Meanwhile we have the ‘dangerous one’ because he is a pit. Our dog is not permitted outside the house without supervision and a lead if we’re outside the fence (still supervised in the fenced in area). The one time he got out I yelled ‘heel’ and he came right back. Meanwhile, the goldens chase us (and most other residents) into our own yard while the own stands still from his garage just yelling at them but the goldens don’t care. They just bark and snarl and encroach in our (and others) yard.

          I argue it’s the opposite of selfish. Giving time, money, and resources to care and save an animal that was abandoned doesn’t exactly seem selfish.

          I’m all for rescuing as many dogs as we can as a society (regardless of breed), but serious thought and planning needs to be in place as there are a lot of incapable people out there.

          • EatATaco@lemm.eeEnglish
            52·
            7 months ago

            It’s a statistics thing. Sure training has a lot to do with it, but these were dogs bred to be aggressive and thus are more likely to be aggressive, with equal training. On top of that, they were bred to be big and strong. So when they do attack, they can do a lot more damage.

            It’s a dangerous combo. Yes I’ve known some super sweet ones. But there are so many other god breeds out there that score high on human compatibility and sociability with other dogs…the question is why even get higher risk dogs?

            • Shaggy1050@lemmy.worldEnglish
              43·
              7 months ago

              Statistically the breed is misidentified as well leading to many ‘pitbull’ attacks not being actual pitbulls. Again, I’m not saying they’re not dangerous or that just anyone should own one but they should be treated like any other dog of their ilk. Rotts, German Shepards, Cane Corsos, Dobermanns, all are capable of massive damage but there aren’t nearly as many of those in need of a good home and good guidance. The problem is there are SO MANY pitbulls. By adopting one, I’m helping save a life since they are killed in shelters so much earlier than other breeds. Just like I’m not having kids and if I change my mind one day, I’ll adopt. I can adopt a dog that is at-risk and turn around their life, why wouldn’t I?

            • Shaggy1050@lemmy.worldEnglish
              21·
              7 months ago

              Not yet but the neighbors German shepherd did bite our late dog’s noise and cause a laceration when they were first getting introduced. I don’t blame the dog. They had just rescued it and still needed socialization (our dog was just fine and it was a controlled environment).

              I also have been bitten by a German shepherd that was a family’s dog. That one actually needed stitches. But again, it was a rescue and had a terrible temperament. They had the dog for a while but it was terribly trained and they shouldn’t have had the dog as they couldn’t control it.

              Our neighbor’s dog is so sweet and just needed some work. I’m not sure what happened to the other dog but I didn’t want to press chargers or anything. It’s just a dog that needed cared for by someone capable.

              Despite having bad experiences with German shepherds, I would never say it’s a problem with the breed. That’s just prejudice and ignorant.

        • AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.caEnglish
          57·
          7 months ago

          Where’s the line? Should normal people also not be able to have German Shepard’s since they’re also dangerous if not raised properly? I had a GS in the past and she was one of the best dogs I’ve ever had, amazing and funny personality and insanely loveable. But that’s because she was brought up in a house where she was treated right and raised right.

          Blame the dumbass owners not the dogs themselves ffs. Just because you or someone else is scared of certain dogs doesn’t mean they should be blanket banned for everyone.

          • crapwittyname@lemm.eeEnglish
            113·
            7 months ago

            Nobody is blaming the dogs. The humans that bred then to have the instinct to never let go until their prey is dead, they are the bad guys here. It’s a bit like how pugs are fraught with health problems their whole lives because people think their funny faces are cute. Not their fault, but they have to live with it. XL bullies aren’t evil. They’re just doing what their breed does. Unfortunately what their breed does ends up killing people quite often.

      • pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
        213·
        7 months ago

        My Maltese does not have the physical capability of harming me. No temperament test required.

        Not scientific but from observing human behavior in my own weird family genetics mixup, I am convinced that creatures behavior is 80% genetics and 20% environment. And bull-breeds were bred to aggressively tear apart other living creatures.

      • drislands@lemmy.worldEnglish
        161·
        7 months ago

        Honest question. Why do you think aggression isn’t a trait that can be selectively bred for or against? Surely you agree other traits can be bred – herding and pointing, to use some common examples.

      • fiercekitten@lemm.eeEnglish
        163·
        7 months ago

        Because pitbulls can be raised in a loving environment with great humans and you can do everything right and the pitbull can still be set off or triggered by something many years into its peaceful life and suddenly start attacking people. They can have a moment where they simply snap, and given their strength and determination, that’s dangerous and horrifying.

        • intensely_human@lemm.eeEnglish
          83·
          7 months ago

          And people who consciously decide to keep them in their own household, with their own children, are willfully ignorant or downright evil.

      • intensely_human@lemm.eeEnglish
        133·
        7 months ago

        Why can’t you understand that being capable of snuggling does not make a pitbull incapable of killing.

      • Classy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        41·
        7 months ago

        To claim that it’s entirely environmental is to flaunt longstanding understanding on how genetics works. Nobody looks at border collies, with their high intelligence, and say “oh it’s just environment”, or chihuahuas being territorial little shits and say “oh it’s just environment”. These dogs were ENGINEERED to be this way, it’s in their bones.

        Pitbulls have been specifically bred for their toughness, their aggression, their locking jaw, and because you happened to get a couple good ones doesn’t invalidate the fact that they are statistically one of the most dangerous breeds to own.

        • JStenoien@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          24·
          7 months ago

          The fact that you just cited the completely made up “locking jaw” myth really shows how valid and researched your opinion is on this topic…

          • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
            21·
            7 months ago

            The fact you misrepresented their point to make it sound like a gotcha moment says more about you then the person you replied to.

      • Shaggy1050@lemmy.worldEnglish
        13·
        7 months ago

        Hate in general is mostly irrational and sadly propaganda plays into the tribalistic nature of humans.

    • Woht24@lemmy.worldEnglish
      816·
      7 months ago

      That’s very naive. There’s plenty of breeds of dogs that kill people.

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        191·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, that’s true, but in the UK XL Bullies specifically have been doing all the maulings recently that have generated serious press coverage; also they themselves have just been added as the sixth (?) banned canine breed in the UK.

    • then_three_more@lemmy.worldEnglish
      41·
      7 months ago

      From the article

      From 1 February, it became a criminal offence to own the XL bully breed in England and Wales without an exemption certificate. Anyone who owns one of the dogs must have had the animal neutered, have it microchipped and keep it muzzled and on a lead in public, among other restrictions.

      So I’m guessing she got them before they were banned and had an exception so she didn’t have to have them destroyed.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nzEnglish
        527·
        7 months ago

        Or didn’t and simply flouted the law.

        There’s a stereotype of people who own those breed(s) for a reason.

    • Classy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      167·
      7 months ago

      The lady across the street from us used to own a small dog, I think it passed and she recently got an XL bully. She struggles to walk it, always looks angry with the dog, it’s always barking and glaring at me and my family. I have been carrying my gun more recently because I’m waiting for the day that dog decides to try to make a meal out of my two-year-old.

      Why are dognuts the way they are? Just get a fucking pom.

  • 11111one11111@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2811·
    7 months ago

    Idk if it’s the same everywhere but in my experience in America I have came across a huge range of canine breeds owned by a huge range of human breeds (quality of person) and 100% of the time the human was a caring person that loved their dog the breed is unnoticeable. On the other side, when the human is subpar the breed of the dog is more noticeable as an inverse correlation to how shitty the person is.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.eeEnglish
      285·
      7 months ago

      This is the dog equivalent of “guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”

      But without the gun, no one would be killed by the gun.

      • tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.mlEnglish
        323·
        7 months ago

        But without the gun, no one would be killed by the gun.

        … those ones not killed by the gun would be killed by the next lethal device in place of it, it is the will which drives the action, not the device

        • Pilferjinx@lemmy.worldEnglish
          15·
          7 months ago

          Guns are essentially magic spears. They pierce with great force at very large distances. The next down are toys in comparison.

        • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.eeEnglish
          121·
          7 months ago

          Lmao but at least next lethal device isn’t something that has sole purpose of killing people.

          Like how stupid you have to be… guns only and one numbero uno purpose is killing people. And they are fucking good at it, nothing else comes close.

          A knife? Bitch please you have to get close, grab the victim and stab many times. It’s easier to run away from a blade than from a fucking bullet unless you are Neo.

          What’s the purpose of legal gun ownership?? To defend against legal gun ownership. It’s a fucking ouroboros of stupidity.

        • Cypher@lemmy.worldEnglish
          8·
          7 months ago

          Your opinion is not grounded in fact as represented by statistics from a wide range of countries.

          • tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.mlEnglish
            15·
            7 months ago

            Then it will be something else.

            Mind I’m not defending the free-guns-for-all policy so dear to a sadly large part of americans, I’m just saying that the tool is not the real issue, that one would be the finality of the action and the fecklessness, the morbidly carelessness and yet horrible thoroughness, attached to the though of ending or seriously harming another person. That one is a cultural problem, and very deep.

            Sure guns were instrumental to spread and nourishing such culture, but if it wasn’t the gun then the will to kill would have been manifested through the next available tool.

            • GiddyGap@lemm.eeEnglish
              61·
              7 months ago

              What next tool are you talking about?

              Guns are specifically designed to kill people as quickly and efficiently as possible and at great distance. Take that tool away and you put some serious limits on the will to kill.

        • Kedly@lemm.eeEnglish
          11·
          7 months ago

          Guns are the easiest method to kill people with. A spree stabber isnt going to kill and main NEAR as many people before they are dealt with as a spree shooter will

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldBEnglish
    181·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:

    The woman, who was in her 50s, was pronounced dead at the scene in Cornwall Close, Hornchurch, and the two registered dogs were safely seized having been contained inside a room, a spokesperson for the Metropolitan police said.

    A spokesperson for the Met said: “Police were called to Cornwall Close around 1.12pm … to reports of a woman attacked by a dog.

    “These were registered XL bully dogs and prior to officers’ arrival had been contained inside a room in the house.

    From 1 February, it became a criminal offence to own the XL bully breed in England and Wales without an exemption certificate.

    Footage of an XL bully dog attacking members of the public in the street in Birmingham, including a 11-year-old girl who sustained shoulder and arm injuries, prompted an outcry in September.

    In November 2021, 10-year-old Jack Lis was mauled to death by a seven-stone XL bully dog called Beast.

    The original article contains 344 words, the summary contains 153 words. Saved 56%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Optional@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2917·
    7 months ago

    Cripes, what kind of a dick do you have to be to your own dogs to get attacked by them?

    • ArbiterXero@lemmy.worldEnglish
      10315·
      7 months ago

      Sometimes the breed temperament has more to do with it than anything else….

      But also assholes all seem to like the same breed so….

      • Optional@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2510·
        7 months ago

        Breed temperament is a thing, but all dogs can be good dogs. Most are good with only slight work. People get a breed they can’t handle and no one’s happy.

        • ArbiterXero@lemmy.worldEnglish
          342·
          7 months ago

          It pains me to say this as a great dog lover, and someone that has known some very loving pitbulls, Sadly not all dogs can be good dogs.

          Like people, some are just born as “assholes”

          But yes, breed temperament is a thing. Not an absolute thing, but still a thing.

      • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.worldEnglish
        32·
        7 months ago

        My buddy legit owns a dire wolf (half wolf, half dog) and never had a problem in the last ten years. He owns a large chunk of property so the dog isn’t restricted to one room in an apartment in the city, and he knows how to handle a large animal. I will say one thing, that thing commands respect, it’s easily 7 foot from back paws to front paws.

        • ArbiterXero@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          7 months ago

          Even pitbulls are safe in the right hands. Fuck it, tigers and lions and silverback gorillas are safe in the right environment.

          However a proper education in caring for the animals aswell as proper enclosures and a knowledge of the animal and its needs….

          Yes you CAN do it, but should Tom from down the street have his own pitbull army and alligator pool in his back yard?

          Hard pass.

          I’m sure some people can do it safely, but training, registration, safety, etc…. Ban them all as pets unless you get X license, like a gun.

          • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.worldEnglish
            2·
            7 months ago

            You barely need to pass a background check to get a gun, lol. It’s harder to get a driver’s license. I’m not saying your wrong, just using a gun as reference is not the best comparison. If your doing private transfer of gun ownership, which is completely legal in most states, the background check is irrelevant.

              • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.worldEnglish
                1·
                7 months ago

                I’m unfamiliar with Canadian law but I bet if your friend or neighbor wanted to sell a gun and you wanted to buy, the background check process would be a lot easier than if you went to a retailer like Walmart or whatever, and would probably still be considered legal.

                • strawberrysocial@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  2·
                  7 months ago

                  When my step dad died, it was a difficult process trying to legally sell his hand guns. You can’t buy guns from Walmart here either. That’s so strange that you can where you’re from.

              • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.worldEnglish
                21·
                7 months ago

                They might be inanimate objects but they are much more destructive than dogs. Can a dog kill you? Yes. Can a gun kill you? Yes, but a gun is much more likely to get the job done than a dog.

                • intensely_human@lemm.eeEnglish
                  2·
                  7 months ago

                  Actually all a gun can do is sit there. There is zero chance of your gun killing you. You might accidentally kill yourself with it, but the gun is never going to kill you.

    • x4740N@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      5011·
      7 months ago

      There is no evidence that she was being terrible towards the dogs

      Some dogs can just snap and decide to not be nice one day, its a good reason you don’t let dogs you’ve seen be calm interact with babies because it only takes a small amount of the dog not being nice to end up harming a baby

      Older people have a better chance of surviving dog attacks but the chance isn’t 100% and cases like this can happen

      And if I recall correctly this breed is more prone to aggressiveness

      • Optional@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1713·
        7 months ago

        I doubt it. Not walking them enough, keeping them cooped up, no outlets - especially if they weren’t fixed. Sad all around, but the dogs are not hatching evil plans, they’re just dogs.

        Spay and neuter. Spay and neuter. And adopt.

        • stephen01king@lemmy.zipEnglish
          13·
          7 months ago

          Dogs that snapped are not being evil, it’s just them acting on instinct. It’s doesn’t make them bad dogs, but it does make them dangerous.

        • x4740N@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
          121·
          7 months ago

          Dogs can still have the potential to snap regardless if you’ve given them a good life

          They could just snap from having a tantrum

        • ChexMax@lemmy.worldEnglish
          6·
          7 months ago

          Some dogs get older and I assume confused and just snap. My grandmother’s dog, sweetest girl, golden retriever, service dog, previously good with other animals and cats. My Grandmom brought home a kitten and the dog mauled it. Do not trust dogs. Just like people they can do something totally out of character.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.worldEnglish
    121·
    7 months ago

    people should be required to have really serious animal rescue and psychology training to get one of these dogs (or else astronomical punishment). most people who get these dogs do so on a whim and because of their own unresolved ego issues.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zipEnglish
      31·
      7 months ago

      Some are good boys that need a home. We adopted a dog of unknown breed, they had his mom (who looked like a black mouth cur), who came in from a kill shelter pregnant.

      I still don’t know what breed he is, really don’t care to find out. But he has a lot of bully features. Big puffy chest. Blocky head. Strong jaw. Smart. Highly emotional.

      And he’s a fucking marshmallow. An 80lb slobbery marshmallow.

    • sploosh@lemmy.worldEnglish
      21·
      7 months ago

      The best dog I ever had was a pit. Sweet as pie, just wanted to cuddle and love. We chose him because he was a big meaty guy with the most adorable face you’d ever seen, and because he needed a home ASAP. We’d take him on walks and people would cat call him from passing cars, or literally stop us and ask if they could dog-sit. He spent nearly a decade with us, just loving and farting and cuddling and snoring.

      He really didn’t need any help to become a great dog, except that I needed to train him that the cat was a friend and not something to chase and put our mouth on. That took all of a weekend, and that was after he’d been abandoned and abused for half a year before we got him. I know it’s not true for every individual, but many times all a dog really needs a a good home with people that love it.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        7 months ago

        like with every “complex” living being there is of course a large spectrum. But to be on the safe side though anyone who wants to get a pit should be able to fairly certainly understand when a dog is stressed via physical cues and should be able to tell when a de-escalation is needed. And I am not talking about “I had dogs all my life I know what I am doing” kind of thing. More like if you are getting a pit from a shelter you should be required to get some serious mandatory training from a professional. This will (along with fines) will maybe help deter people who get pits for the sake of owning a ferocious dog.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.worldEnglish
    8·
    7 months ago

    “XL bully dogs”? Have we stopped saying “pit bull” because of and I never got the memo?