The university should be the place demonstrating socioecological change, serving as a site of experimentation and praxis (see Dunlap et al., 2023). This, however, could not be further from the truth. Beside advancing technologies of digital, political and military control (Chatterjee & Maira, 2014), not to mention genetic dissection and animal vivisection—or some degree of this (Pellow, 2014)—universities fail to enact real examples of socioecological of renewability and sustainability. How come universities are not overflowing with agroecology, permaculture and forest gardens on and inside universities? How come universities are not self-generating their own electricity needs through wind, solar and other lower-carbon infrastructures? We, unfortunately, are witnessing the opposite at university campuses around the world.

https://www.grassrootsjpe.org/view/resource.php?resource=26

  • Kallioapina
    link
    fedilink
    English
    135
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    This is also a big reason why I’m few weeks from submitting my masters for inspection, and 90% of my references/sources are from Annas Archive / Zlib. Our uni library, in supposedly rich nordic country Finland, just cant afford all the licenses. Luckily all our professors and researchers are in on the “secret”, but its just a fucking joke.

    Most of the world economy is on the same fucking joke. Just leeches upon leeches upon leeches… And so few people giving anything usefull to the world. I fucking try, but god damn these useless money leeches in the middle try to make it hard as possible. Fuck. So fucking angry, but what can I do but try to minimize the damages I do on my personal part.

      • @qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1023 days ago

        Very cool. I know someone, in a fairly small but funded field, who had this sort of requirement — Elsevier had the relevant publication, but they couldn’t publish there due to access policies (or it was going to be painful to do so at any rate). So they started their own publication!

        I forgot the specifics, but it essentially uses arXiv as the backend, and there’s a (commercially available?) frontend that lets editors and reviewers do their thing. “Publishing” in this journal is essentially just endorsing an arXiv paper; so it’s open access by design.

        Really cool stuff. Their field is small enough that iirc they could kinda get critical mass to give Elsevier the finger and adopt this new platform. Warm fuzzy feeling thinking about it!

      • @daddy32@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        723 days ago

        You forgot the part where this resulted in giving even more money to the publishers for the “Open access”. World is fucked.

  • @gi1242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2923 days ago

    so back in the day we needed publishers for distribution. now with the Internet, distribution is easy. but prices only went up

    associate editors and referees are unpaid volunteers. typesetting is also mainly done by the authors. but prices are high because the publisher wants to profit.

    there are quite a few high quality journals that are fairly priced and published by non profit publishers. these are the only journals authors should publish in …

  • shameless
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1723 days ago

    Given the times I’ve seen news articles and screenshots of poorly vetted published journals. Surely a free open source publisher managed by the academic community can’t be much worse? I also don’t know shit about the requirements to actually publish so this is probably a naive take

  • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1623 days ago

    also a lot of research work in brazil disallows you to get a second job. you are forced to live with the little money they pay you.

    its almost like they don’t want there to be research here.

  • @iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1223 days ago

    One should do a study about much these supposedly open access journals are profiting and who are their shareholders and what not

  • @WholeEnchilada@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1122 days ago

    I would like to see this written up for a wider context because it’s not just a science problem. The Humanities, Arts, and pretty much the whole campus is the same in this way. It’s why I left academia. Universities are set up wrong because employee incentives make it a sort of feudalistic system. All you have to do is work as a professor for a few years and discover it’s pretty much the same as grad school. You don’t really collaborate with the people you work with every day in person. All your contacts are outside your home campus. Nothing useful for the world happens on the campus. You do that outside of the campus to gain “reknown” and your outside brand gets you cred on campus. Meanwhile, on your home campus, your so-called colleagues do everything they can to block any cross-listing of courses they can because the administration counts the beans. The department needs to generate credit hours. Cross-listing is viewed as bean subtraction.

    • @fossilesqueOPM
      link
      English
      522 days ago

      Peep the link I shared, it’s from the Journal of Politcal Ecology. The author has more bits I’m meaning to dive into.

      • @WholeEnchilada@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        422 days ago

        I think (another reason I left academia) you missed my point. You posted to a science place. My point is that it should be cross posted to many places.

        • @fossilesqueOPM
          link
          English
          422 days ago

          Ha, we agree. I did misunderstand, forgive me. I don’t know honestly if I’m going to stay in this game either after this. Going to be a bit of a dice roll.

          • @WholeEnchilada@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            222 days ago

            Well if you’re a scientist you have better paying options than i did when i left. I was in the Humanities. Still greener pastures and less bullshit for me. I guess I’ll try to be helpful: reprogram your career brain. In the real world, it isn’t all about you and your abilities or how smart you are. It’s just about what you already know from life and your special abilities you gained from work experience, plus your educational background. It was hard for me at first now it’s super easy plus im actually compensated for my work as i think is fair.

            • @fossilesqueOPM
              link
              English
              322 days ago

              I’m an older PhD. I’ve already worked outside of it but found more of the same shit on the inside lol.

              • @WholeEnchilada@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                122 days ago

                Well, im considered quite old myself. I’m no spring chicken. Please do consider posting a little wider when you find the time. I’m sure you have plenty if you’ve been promoted to full. All your little assistant profs are busier than you no doubt.

  • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1123 days ago

    sighs from Eastern Europe

    You’d think that they’re using the money for prizes for reviewers or as scholarship prizes. What are they doing with all that money? Hosting a journal can’t be that expensive.

  • littleblue✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    823 days ago

    Please don’t give the overlords ideas. “Minimum wage” as a currency? Talk about dystopian present, damn.

  • @BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    722 days ago

    Libgen and Scihub exist for this exact reason. How is it we’ve arrived at a situation where capitalists are deciding how knowledge is propagated?

  • @BluesF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    622 days ago

    Academic publishing seems like a problem that should be easy to solve. It’s a situation where greed is outright making the service worse for everyone, so it seems like a new journal that does things differently (e.g. by not charging researchers) could become wildly successful… So why doesn’t that happen? Are there barriers to creating new journals?