• MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    For those of you contemplating ways of covering up the ads:

    This is the same airline that beat the shit out of that doctor because the airline overbooked the flight. For your own safety, do not cross this airline.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      The Chicago Department of Aviation did that. The same way if the police ends up killing someone, it was not the person calling the police.

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        United was booting passengers to make room for employee transfers though, the situation was shit before dept of aviation even got the call.

        • Eheran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Sure, but telling someone to leave their plane for some oddball reason is “only bad” not outright crazy like what happened then.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Those employees could have stood. Frontier and Spirit give vouchers out when they intentionally overbook…which before the pandemic was everyday. If nobody takes the bait, they up the voucher value. For them it’s essentially monopoly money.

          If United couldn’t get anybody to bite at the vouchers, then the employees should have stood the whole flight. Instead, they beat a man who was not fighting back physically. He only insisted that he get to his patient. They LITERALLY dragged him off the plane. By his ankle, as he tried to grab onto anything he could.

          • aeharding@vger.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            If United couldn’t get anybody to bite at the vouchers, then the employees should have stood the whole flight.

            Yeah, that is not a solution. The FAA is salivating at the thought of this. Everyone must have a seat for takeoff and landing.

      • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        it was not the person calling the police.

        At this point anyone calling the police in the US is a necessary accomplice, and guilty of conspiracy to commit murder, aggravated battery, and probably several other crimes.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Overbooking should be a mandatory minimum compensation of the greater of 1000x the ticket price or $20k. It’s a truly fucked up practice to disrespect people’s time like that.

      • Drusas@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        Have you ever turned a screen off on one of these planes? They turn back on. So you turn them off again. Sooner or later, they turn back on. And repeat.

          • Drusas@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            I don’t think you’re being beaten up for it. I certainly am not beating you up for it. But usually, yeah, the screen does come back on during the flight. I think they turn it back on automatically every time there’s an announcement. As somebody who finds screens like that very distracting and even migraine-inducing (the “busyness” of that sort of thing is a big trigger), it’s really frustrating.

          • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Depends on the plane and system it has. Last United flight I was on it stayed off the entire flight. I use my phone and generally don’t look at it anyway but it was nicer I suppose.

          • mriormro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            People like you constantly give corporations an inch because “it’s not a big deal” and here we are.

          • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I honestly couldn’t care less how many adverts they show me, they can have a constant stream of adverts the whole flight if it means that some shitty corporation is paying a portion of my travel coats.

            People really need to grow up about stuff like this, if you don’t want adverts then pay for a premium service - I’m poor, I’ll accept the adverts.

            • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Here’s the thing: companies have learned they can add ads to make additional money without passing any of that on to their customers.

              If you think you’re going to get a better rate for having ads, you’re fooling yourself. They’ll always charge as much as they can get people to pay and that amount isn’t affected by ads most of the time.

              • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                This is thinking based on emotion not reality, most of the internet is free because of adverts so your belief that it’s not used to lower prices is clearly silly. Yes companies love profit but they often increase profits by lowering prices to attract more business, it’s a perfectly valid business model to use adverts to reduce the cost to the customer and increase customer volume.

            • wagoner@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              That money isn’t subsidizing your flight cost, it’s increasing corporate profits.

      • reversebananimals@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        “If you don’t like it don’t fly”

        Seriously just shut up.

        Edit: LMAO just saw your other comment where you actually said this sincerely. You’re a parody of yourself.

  • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 months ago

    So I am going to sit down and the screen will be full of penis enlargement pills? What will all the hot singles in the area think?

  • ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 months ago

    More to consider when selecting an airline. Greedy fuckers, I hope their stock takes a nosedive thanks to this

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’ll probably take a small dip and then rise quite a bit once profits from implementing it start rolling in

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I assume they won’t allow porns in ads, but you can still get worse stuff than porn, like erectile dysfunction medication ads which causes people around your seat to look at you with sorry eyes.

  • Cosmos7349@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    The thing I hate is that all these airline screens usually default to “on”, and people tend to leave defaults. I’m a tall person, and can usually see a large number of the screens in front of me. So if I’m on a night flight, even if I don’t intend to sleep, the only way to not be blinded by dozens of ads for a few hours is to bring a sleep mask.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      I feel so bad for tall people on planes. It’s uncomfortable AF for all of us, but you guys have to become human origami just to sit. It’s insane that this shit is legal. I avoid flying as much as possible.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s uncomfortable AF for all of us

        Idk, I’m pretty comfortable on planes, and I’m around 5’8 lol

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Also, ths taller you are, the more likely you are to be seriously injured in severe turbulence, malfunctions, minor crashes and major crashes.

      • CodingCarpenter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m tall and fat it’s a double whammy. Granted one I’ve done to myself, luckily I generally only fly with my wife so I can get the isle seat to stretch

    • Drusas@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      They also automatically turn the screens back on repeatedly after you turn them off.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      About a decade ago Fox News got brought to court, and had to defend themselves against the idea that their content wasn’t actually factually accurate most of the time. Therefore not “news”.

      Fox responded by saying that their program wasn’t meant to be news. I forget the exact quote, I’m sure duckduckgo is your friend, but it was along the lines of “No reasonable person would ever consume Fox News content and believe it to be trustworthy accurate news. It is an opinionated entertainment show about the news.”

      I don’t remember their tagline at the time, but it was something along the lines of “Fox News is your only outlet for unbiased news!” Something to that effect. I just remember Jon Stewart calling out the hypocrasy of their tagline being the exact opposite of what they said in court.

      If Fox News is entertainment meant to push the agenda that the right is right, and if CNN is entertainment meant to push the agenda that the left is right, then I don’t see why The Onion can’t join them as entertainment meant to push the agenda that the whole world is fucking stupid.

      Still operating as a “real news source”, except it’s all bullshit like Fox News and CNN. Just entertainment.

  • hopesdead@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I already dislike the experience of being with other passengers on United. Nothing negative occurred on my part, just noticed how badly behaved other passengers were compared to every other airline I’ve flown.

    My point is, I wouldn’t pick United to fly as my first choice.

  • Voytrekk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    Can you turn the screens off? I haven’t flown in 5 years, but I just watched stuff off of my tablet instead.

    • LdyMeow@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      7 months ago

      In my experience yes, but some planes ive notice they turn back on each time there is an announcement, so depending on how many it can be annoying. Eother way advertising is a cancer that plagues our lives more and more.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      You can, but I’ve stopped ever using them because the screen completely stops for every. Single. Announcement.

      And now you can have your phone out for take off and landings, so yea no thanks I’ll stick with my device that keeps working when they’re making some random announcement about drinks or some shit

  • sporks_a_plenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    …that will now reflect the information United has compiled on individual travelers, like where they live and destinations they’ve traveled to.

    I, for one, can’t wait to have my personal info proudly displayed to whatever randos they seat next to me! /s

    • residentmarchant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Basic economy will eventually only let you select any ad in their library. Actual content is for regular economy passengers only!

  • archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    The Ad Algorithm

    It knows when you are sleeping It knows when you’re awake It knows when you’ve been bad or good So consume for goodness sake

    Fuck this.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      nodding off? time for a bright ad with super saturation and lots of brightness variability, they’ll strobe you into paying attention.

      how much do you have to pay to turn the fucking thing off?

        • redisdead@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Shouldn’t be that far away from them in the first place if you actually cared.

          • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            This is fucking hilarious. Do you know that sometimes, people go elsewhere for economic opportunities? Then they bring their children after they get settled in?

            Sometimes they go back, and leave the children there.

            Do you think those kids should be stranded?

              • cole@lemdro.id
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                sometimes people don’t want to live in the middle of nowhere forever. not many engineering jobs there. we all want economic mobility too

                • redisdead@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  The ultimate quest for wealth is worth destroying the planet.

                  Also vast majority of people take planes for leisure, I’m sure we can deal without them. People used to travel the world in sail boats and they still managed to get where they wanted to go.

    • residentmarchant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s truly amazing…they must stand at the front of meetings and just ask “how do we make our passengers hate us most?”

      Maybe I don’t understand the economics of this move, but are they really going to make that much more money from targeted ads? If it’s double the price, I assume it’s worth it, but if it’s a ~10% gain it’s just dumb.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Most people will be too busy with their laptops, tablets, and phones to pay any attention to whatever ads they put on those screens.