• Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    While I’ve always thought that, I’ve also heard that it’s the point where the plastic may not be reliable enough to contain or keep the contents uncontaminated. Either way, it’s the plastic.

    • Didros@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      You would think that the abrasive nature of the salt would shave off more plastic than the plastic breaking down. I guess you need to keep track of how many earth quakes you get and how much you shake the container when you get salt.

        • Shdwdrgn
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          And to think of how mad everyone got when everything was packaged in those ‘heavy’ glass bottles and jars, and manufacturers started putting everything into plastic because the glass was creating too much litter on the roads. Now here we are 30 years later and everyone is being killed by plastic.

          • Rhaedas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            manufacturers started putting everything into plastic because the glass was creating too much litter on the roads plastic was cheaper.

            Fixed. It’s always about profit.

            • Shdwdrgn
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s also lighter weight and thus cheaper to ship… But they promised that you totally couldn’t tell the difference in taste to food products! (Everybody could tell the difference)