Guaranteed income programs let participants use funds however they see fit. Critics argue they’re not a good use of taxpayer dollars.

Guaranteed income programs have become more popular since the pandemic as dozens of cities across the country launched pilot programs using federal COVID-19 relief funds. Whereas other welfare funds like food stamps and housing vouchers provide assistance for specific expenses, guaranteed income programs allow recipients to decide how they spend the money. Researchers have found them to be an effective way to combat poverty.

In recent years, a handful of Texas cities and counties have piloted their own guaranteed income programs for low-income households. Financed by a combination of federal, local and philanthropic funds, Austin, San Antonio and El Paso County have collectively issued about $9 million in payments to roughly 1,500 households since 2020.

But the notion is facing stiff opposition from conservatives who say these programs are a bad use of taxpayers’ money and amount to government overreach. Attorney General Ken Paxton recently sued Harris County to block its guaranteed income program, Uplift Harris. The Texas Supreme Court indefinitely paused the pilot while the case goes to trial. Financed by funds from the American Rescue Plan Act, the program would have provided almost 2,000 households in the area’s poorest neighborhoods with $500 a month for 18 months.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    5 months ago

    “I don’t want none of MY tax dollars going to the poor and needy! If we’re gonna give anything away it needs to go to chickenshit police departments, global corporations, and the obscenely wealthy.”

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Don’t forget the military!! If we spent a penny less than 2 trillion dollars per year that would make Jesus very angry!!

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Jesus would NEVER stand for this! Helping the poors? Not on Jesus’s watch!

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 months ago

    Meanwhile, 90% of the people are poorer than they would have been if the poorest could afford to participate in the economy.

    These people are either idiots who don’t know anything about how a consumerism-based economy works, awful people who consider cruelty towards those who already have less than themselves more important, or both.

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Those taxes should be going to line my buddies pockets so I get some kickbacks, not to help improve this state and the lives of the citizens in it!”

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    R is the party of taking things away. You can summarize very nearly everything they do this way.

  • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s almost like they don’t want to help people prosper. That stance is going to cost them dearly at the polls most likely.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if Texas turns inexplicably purple. :)

  • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Christians: Give your money to the poor and love your neighbor as yourself.

    Also Christians: Those lazy illegals are taking our jobs! We shouldn’t be taking people’s hard-earned money and just GIVING it to people who have PROVEN they can’t manage it! What about MY bootstraps!

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    “Lets fix a problem” -literally anyone

    Conservatives with fists clenched: “no”

  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Letting people do as they see fit is “government overreach”. FFS. That fits right in with “war is peace” and “freedom is slavery”!

    I hate conservatives so much, and that goes double for Texas Republicans.

    • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Trump won TX in 2020 by only 631,221 votes. If we have better turnout this year, we could make TX blue! The polls are only busy on the final day to vote, even though we have a 2 week long voting period with the polls open during the same hours as election day during the entire 2nd week of voting. Don’t wait until the last day and check if your local polling places are open on the weekend!

      For those in TX, the last day to register to vote is Oct 7.

      Voting goes from October 21-Nov 1, with one final day to cast your vote on Nov 5.

      Applications to vote by mail must be received by Oct 25.

      Check your registration status, local polling locations and hours, important dates, and other election information at the link below.

      https://www.votetexas.gov/mobile/index.htm

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    And ofc Ken Paxton, the scummiest skin bag to ever ooze out of the Tea Party’s corpse, thinks it’s a bad thing. Probably because he doesn’t get to line his pockets from the programs’ funding before poor people get paid.

  • Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    One thing I really don’t understand about America is how it’s one of the most charitable countries on earth - but when it comes to proven government run charity there is usually strong pushback.

    Like I understand how it happens I just wish people would evaluate their politicians more and think about whether or not their values actually align.

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you’re referring to dollars given/promised to “charity,” a huge amount of that is done in a way that protects assets from taxes but primarily benefits the donor or the donor’s offspring.

      Example: Warren Buffet has billions he has pledged to charity. However, when he dies it goes into a private charitable trust that conveniently employs his children and pays them millions a year for “administration” duties. The trust can donate stocks to charities, and there is a tax exemption for the “value” of the donation, reducing the tax burden of the trust further. Billionaire charity in the USA is a nearly-complete fiction which is actually more in line with the behavior discussed in this article.