Despite how hot it is, landlords in Tennessee are not required to keep the air conditioning running.

In our changing climate, that probably comes as a surprise.

However, unless it’s in the lease, nothing in Tennessee’s Landlord-Tenant Act gives renters the right to air conditioning.

“I think it’s unfair. It’s inhumane to me because without air we can’t live and breathe,” said Anita Brown.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    people used to build houses that were designed in such a way where you didn’t need air conditioning. In tropical country such as Vietnam where I live this is still the case. I have to wonder if the United States builds houses inefficiently on purpose.

    • jam12705@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think we got lazy with our designs once centralized air was mainstreamed. The house my father grew up in the 1950s was designed like you mentioned. It would only allow light through during certain times of year/day with its overhanges and louvers and it jad more windows which allow more air flow…now according to him it was still a miserable place to live during the 1950s Texas summers…

      • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Most of our houses have to stand up to the cold too (at least presently). Idk how much this affects what kind of designs are possible, but some brain roughage for ya.

        • Strykker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Surprising keeping the cold out vs in doesn’t change much. You insulate the shit out of the building to minimize unwanted transfer from outside to inside.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The comments two and three levels up were about third-world tropical houses and old houses respectively, both designed to be habitable in hot climates without air conditioning. As such, they are/were designed exactly the opposite way: to maximize cross-ventilation instead.

            What you really want these days would be a house that’s tightly insulated but also has lots of operable windows, a whole-house fan, and/or a design that facilitates stack effect ventilation so that it can use either cooling strategy when conditions are appropriate.

      • acockworkorange
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Modern houses with their insulated walls and double windows are better at withstanding summer than the ones I’ve lived in while my only solace for 85+ degree nights was a fan.

        I’m all for demanding proper maintenance from landlords, even if it’s not on the lease. You visit a unit that has a thermostat on it, that’s advertising it has a working AC. It’s disingenuous from the landlord to claim the AC is decorative.

        But claiming air conditioning is essential is utter horseshit.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sort of. Pretty much all of suburban housing is cookie cutter houses made out of the cheapest possible material available. Really the only improvements we’ve made is better insulation and standardized 2 way heat pumps.

      I can’t imagine apartments and buildings are much better when you can just slap an AC onto anything and call it a day.

    • ItDoBeHowItDoBe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I am from the US and am living in malaysia at the moment and have traveled throughout South East Asia. I think the issue is not that our homes are built I efficiently, but that we just do not tolerate heat the same way that those in South East Asia do. We could open our windows and doors like they do in asia to create a draft and cool down, but it would still be warmer than we would like. Living in Asia is warmer than we would like in general.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I have to wonder if the United States builds houses inefficiently on purpose.

      Starting roughly during the housing boom just after WWII, the United States started building houses cheaply on purpose. One of the most noticeable changes is common house designs went from being Craftsman bungalows with high (e.g. 10’) ceilings, lots of windows for good ventilation, and large roof overhangs for shade and protection from wind-driven rain, to “American Small Houses” with 8’ ceilings, minimal windows and no roof overhangs.

      As the owner of one of the latter (in the South, BTW), I can tell you that trying to keep it cool via cross-ventilation is largely ineffective.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you think US houses are bad, you should see Australian houses. Barely any insulation and very draughty drafty, so they’re too cold in winter and too hot in summer. A huge percentage of houses fall below the WHO’s recommended safe temperature in winter.

      Sure, you can use AC or heating, but it dissipates very quickly.

      I’m from Melbourne, and the climate there is fairly similar to the San Francisco Bay Area where I live now. Similar winter weather, but it gets a bit hotter in summer. Bay Area houses are much more comfortable though. My US house is a 1960s build yet it has way better insulation than even a 2010s build in Australia.

      • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Most varieties of stone (cobble, concrete, brick, etc.) are very expensive, especially in comparison to lumber in places where tree farms are plentiful.

        Also, idk if you’ve seen a modern wood house, but they’re practically hollow, save for fiberglass insulation. They use far less material than stone buildings.