• FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think the inability to destroy or create matter counts as Evidence but not necesarily Proof.

    • Daxtron2@startrek.website
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It doesn’t as the laws of physics as we currently know them break down at the scale and pressures involved in the very early universe.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Alright but until you can create or destroy energy/matter then you have no evidence to back your claims or dispute mine.

            • Daxtron2@startrek.website
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              A claim doesn’t need evidence to the contrary to be disputed, so no thats not what you said

              • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                I said it wasn’t proof, but that it was evidence. You can dispute a claim that has evidence but if you don’t have any evidence yourself you’re going to look like an idiot who ignores the most likely truth and instead clings to their faith.