• astronaut_sloth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Honestly, that 180 day window thing is nominal. The execution of all of that will take way longer with all of the litigation that would happen, and it’ll take a couple of years to get it all enacted (slow at first then accelerating as more gets enacted).

    Personally, I’d prefer if it were fast. The sudden change would wake people up, and cause way more civil unrest. If it’s slow, we end up as frogs slowly boiling. Fewer people will protest or cause issues if things unfold slowly. It’s the idea of the frog in the boiling water. If the changes are swift, there’s a higher chance of ordinary people taking notice and fighting to reverse them.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s the idea of the frog in the boiling water.

      The water is already 208 degrees man. This country is the montage in the opening scenes of a dystopian film as it is.

      Crumbling infrastructure. Natural disasters. Civil unrest. Disease. Tense international relations. Food costs escalating, and only to get worse due to changing climate.

      Except in the experiment that coined the phrase, the frogs jumped out. We ain’t jumping. We’re acting more like crabs in a bucket.