• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Literally yes, it is, in plenty of scenarios. Smoking, for example, causes cancer. So if you get cancer as a result of smoking… that was preventable.

    And deaths from cancer even more so. A lot of cancers can be extremely survivable if caught early.

    Although the article talks about much more than just cancer.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh. Good to know lung cancer is only caused by smoking. I’ll let the doctors know, thanks.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        Again you’re trying to sound clever but instead sounding… well… I’ll let you work that one out on your own.

        I didn’t say lung cancer was only caused by smoking. I said smoking causes cancer (and not just in the lungs, btw).

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They didn’t say cancer was only a result of smoking, but that smoking could cause cancer. You beat down a scarecrow of their argument, well done /s