fossilesqueM to Science MemesEnglish · 7 个月前Pi Dayimagemessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1726arrow-down139
arrow-up1687arrow-down1imagePi DayfossilesqueM to Science MemesEnglish · 7 个月前message-square101fedilink
minus-squareFryHyde@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down7·7 个月前Imagine acting superior about a date format.
minus-squarerepungnant_canary@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down2·7 个月前No need for acting when the (non-US) date format is superior
minus-squareShareni@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·7 个月前DD-MM-YYYY is better, but still causes issues. ISO 8601 though, now that’s a superior format.
minus-squareSemjaza@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 个月前Also the date format used organically in East Asia because of the cultural habit of writing big to small. English tends small to big, so I don’t know where yanks got their date format from.
minus-squaredQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 个月前Can you elaborate on that last part? I fail to think of anything where its natural for English to go from small units to big units.
minus-squareSemjaza@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 个月前Addresses is the main one. But also when talking about objects and categories, e.g. “the oak is a type of tree”, not “trees have a type which is oak”.
Imagine acting superior about a date format.
No need for acting when the (non-US) date format is superior
DD-MM-YYYY is better, but still causes issues. ISO 8601 though, now that’s a superior format.
Also the date format used organically in East Asia because of the cultural habit of writing big to small.
English tends small to big, so I don’t know where yanks got their date format from.
Can you elaborate on that last part? I fail to think of anything where its natural for English to go from small units to big units.
Addresses is the main one.
But also when talking about objects and categories, e.g. “the oak is a type of tree”, not “trees have a type which is oak”.
Great examples! Thanks!