• AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    No, no it would not be beneficial. That would be the opposite of beneficial (unless it’s plant-based steak).

      • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Eating the flesh of an animal is not good for anyone. It’s not good for the animal who was abused their whole life and murdered. It’s not good for the environment. It’s not good for all the beings who get sick from pathogens because of it. And it’s not even good for the human animal who consumes the other animal’s flesh.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Eating the flesh of an animal is not good for anyone.

          It tastes nice and is a source of protein, iron and other minerals.

          It’s not good for the animal who was abused their whole life and murdered.

          True in some cases.

          It’s not good for the environment.

          True in most cases.

          It’s not good for all the beings who get sick from pathogens because of it.

          True. But pathogens also exist on plants. Which is why food standards exist that cover both.