• Melchior@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The EU could also supply Ukraine with weapons, which could destroy Russias entire electricity grid, oil refining capacity, gas network and key pieces of its transport infrastructure. However there is no need to be loud about it, since everybody knows that is true.

  • frazw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Russian warfare is 90% cyber these days. They troll, hack, spy and attempt to influence elections using the internet. Are they really going to cut off their ability to engage in those activities? It’s like saying they will blow up their own weapons factories if people don’t start catching their bullets.

    • Quittenbrot@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      They did waste vast amounts of own men and material when deciding to enter Ukraine to take a quick “short stroll” that somehow now already takes over 900 days. Wouldn’t be the first time they shoot themselves in the foot proper.

  • Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    If they take out the internet, they lose their biggest manipulation tool. As if that’d ever happen…

  • abbadon420@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 months ago

    Oh no… I can’t do my job without Internet… please don’t do this… /s

    • SuspiciousCatThing@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ah jeez that’d be terrible. I’d probably have to stay home because nothing in society would be working. Then to pass the time I’d have to do things like reading the books I’ve been dying for time to read or finally getting to my collection of handheld consoles and emulators.

      Might even have to have a glass of wine to calm my nerves from the stress.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    What degree of aggression against the EU would spur the EU into action?

    Russia already can’t take over Ukraine. It would not be able to fight on more fronts, and certainly not against a strong EU with many more resources to spare.

    Cyberwarfare and individual assassinations, sabotage, and disinformation campaigns were not enough yet. The EU is patient, because there’s nothing to win. But the invasion of Ukraine showed that the EU can suddenly and significantly oppose Russia when certain lines are crossed.

    Surely, it’s in the interest of Russia both as preparation, but in large part to try to unsettle the EU, mainly its citizens. Much like it tried with Nuke warnings. GPS disruptions across borders. Gas and oil cutoffs. Blocking Ukraine food exports. Etc etc.

    • Benjaben@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      I really wonder about this too. If Russia destroys those undersea cables, would that get a direct response? I would like to think so, because that’s a planet-scale disruption (I think?), but it really depends on the people in charge of the countries involved and their stomach for violence and escalation.

      I’m passionate about minimizing war and I seriously hope we never fire nukes at each other again. But a country willing to inflict global damage as a kind of tantrum over their failures in a conflict they single-handedly started…I mean, we can’t tolerate that as a species. There’s gotta be a line somewhere.

      • Kissaki@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t think an attack on undersea cables would spur aggressive/invasive action. I would expect more direct, obvious, and public military presence, observation, and possibly isolation of Russia on it’s borders though.

        Human, especially civilian lives are probably a line. Sabotage that would be inconvenience rather than disabling and cause direct suffering - I don’t think it’d spur direct military action. Political - sure. The EU is already driving a hard sanctioning course, and would likely increase such political responses.

        There are alternative internet routes, and we’re not that dependent on them - in a fundamental, life or death or direct human suffering kind of way.

        • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sandboxing Russia likely won’t happen without some form of reaction. Look at the conflict in the “Spratly Sea”; where Philippine ships literally get pushed from their territory, people died already; now imagine the scale of a whole country and not some WW2 ship turned to island fortress. The civilian reaction alone (aka smuggling) would put several continents into instability.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Realistically the writing is on the wall here. Either Russia comes to its senses, or it will be dealt with eventually. Yes that will be painful, but it will be less painful than letting a nuclear terrorist dictate global norms.

        The reality is that if Russia was willing to walk down the latter path, they would have probably done it already.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I mean, my local server is the backup plan.

    I can game for days without food or water and only need to emerge to forage like once a week.

    Perhaps even visit the local market for fresh memes, but thats it.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        And the vast majority only those games only take up a fraction of that total spaces.

        But yes, this is how digital shit survives the ages.

    • dch82@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      I have every GB, GBC and NES game ever on a HDD, so don’t worry about me either.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh, right, forgot about the golden era of (Linux) handheld emulators. All the games you mentioned on each one.

        • dch82@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          No, retroarch on 13 yo thinkpad and possibly a raspberry pi if needed.

          • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Thats better, and the more fossy/techy approach to accessible software, what people need, what should be preserved for historians, instead of massive-online-predatory-gambling-“games”.

            This and big tiddy Skyrim mods.

            Doom on the other hand will survive for longer than bacteria (probably for a time also running on bacteria).
            As the Sun starts to dim it will spontaneously install itself and run on the great intergalactic web.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well, let them try. It’s unlikely to result in anything more than a temporary disruption and as a result a lot of current shitty practises would need to be improved so I see that as a net positive.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    The moment every hoarder with a home PLEX-server and an overflowing NAS has been waiting for.

  • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Like we couldn’t wreak havoc on them tenfold. Anyone want to bet on the blyats instead of the West?

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      if by world war you mean “every other country shares a look and then stomps russia into annihilation instantly” then sure

      • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t think this true. Russia can certainly be beat but unlike most of their potential adversaries, their arms industry is already producing at high levels and they have a large drafting effort going on.