• m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    There is only one (non-standard) emoji to convey my emotion on the subject

    kekw

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is how you deal with people like him. After trying to treat them fairly, act with strength and authority. Hit them in the wallet whenever possible.

  • silence7@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    4 months ago

    The NYT really does take Musk at his word even when he’s got a real history of banning accounts for saying true-but-left-wing things.

  • breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    In a highly unusual move, Justice Moraes also said that any person in Brazil who tried to still use X via common privacy software called a virtual private network, or VPN, could be fined nearly $9,000 a day.

    Wild stuff.

  • Dagnet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m brazillian and its not quite blocked yet, can access it as of this moment. It will take some time until all internet providers block twitter

    • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Can you tell us more about the motivations? Seems political more than anything specific musk is doing now that he wasnt doing before.

      Im happy to see X go down in flames, but I also dont want citizens silenced if fascism is creeping in.

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        4 months ago

        Mostly because of how Xitter refused to block accounts accounts related to an insurrection at the Capitol, then ignored court orders.

        • acockworkorange
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          To be clear to usinites: that’s the Jan 8 Brazilian capitol uprising, staged a year later and in copy of the orange one.

      • Dagnet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        That judge claims the people he wants banned from the platform are anti democracy and what not, but musk refused to comply. Its a complicated subject and my opinion is just that, my own opinion. That judge (most of them in fact) believe themselves to be all mighty, they interpret the law as they see fit and use their supreme court orders to do as they wish, when their role should be only to act as the highest instance of law in the country. Just today he also froze starlink’s account in the country to charge fines from the twitter issue, that is not exactly the correct way to go about it, he is over stepping his powers.

        To be short: fuck Elon but the supreme court here is also crap and needs a reform.

        • BakerBagel@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Idk. O think most people would say it os reasonable for a sex offender to be forbidden from being within 300 ft of a school zone. I would say that being banned from online forums like Twitter or Facebook is fair game for someone who lead an insurrection against their government. The punishment for that was a rope around the neck in most places until recently.

          • Dagnet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            My problem isnt with the punishment, never was. My problem is how these judges have been dishing their own idea of justice and trampling over all other powers in a democracy.

      • blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not removing misinformation posts, a large amount of unpaid fines, refusal to appoint a legal representative, threatening the judge.

        • acockworkorange
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s it. You can’t receive a court order and ignore on the grounds of “I don’t think it’s legal”. The legal system is there to be used to make those calls.

    • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just out of curiosity: how is the blocking usually implemented? Do they block it via DNS, or is it more sophisticated?

      • Dagnet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Is not nearly as common as you seem to imply, I have never had to deal with that kind of block in my life. It is being done by the isps themselves, thats all I know

  • b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    4 months ago

    The moment posed one of the biggest tests yet of the billionaire’s efforts to transform the site into a digital town square where just about anything goes.

    This is disingenuous reporting of the NYT, just repeating Musk’s untrue “town square” meme, and saying “just about anything goes”. Anarchist and other left wing accounts were the first to be banned, and many accounts and posts from even mildly left or progressive accounts are banned and suppressed. You can’t even say the word “cis”. It’s not a place where anything goes. It’s a place where right wing content is protected and promoted. It’s a Nazi website. Say that.

  • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Blocking Western social media is good. It might boost federated alternatives instead.