• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    This mental gymnastics definition of a paywall is not widely accepted. I was pointing out a small mistake. Is my website paywalled because you need to spend electricity to access it? A paywall is one where a monetary transaction is involved to view the content; that’s just what the word means.

    • xor@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      wow, i didn’t know words became immutable as soon as they’re added to wikipedia….
      or that monetary compensation is the only way to pay someone….

      fantabulous

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Just because you dislike two things, you don’t have to lump them under the same definition. Language could evolve to consider registration-required sites to have a paywall, but that would be stupid and counter to similar usages of “pay”. People seem really eager to stretch negative definitions to include other things they dislike, but it’s not the word that makes something bad, it’s the thing itself. Two things can be different/distinct concepts and also be equally bad.

        • xor@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          just because you can’t understand things doesn’t mean you have to pretend i’m lumping things because i dislike them….

          “pay” has NEVER been limited to currency… you’re just myopically capitalist….

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            And you jump to ad hominem as soon as you’re challenged. You should improve your conversation skills or you will flounder around and never correct inaccuracies in your beliefs. If you believe you do not have inaccuracies in your beliefs despite never changing them, you are wrong. Good luck.

            • xor@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              58 minutes ago

              lol… no, you jumped to ad hominem… a word that you apparently don’t understand