☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 10 hours agoUkrainian men dragged away outside Kyiv nightclubs and restaurants by army recruiterswww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up171arrow-down18
arrow-up163arrow-down1external-linkUkrainian men dragged away outside Kyiv nightclubs and restaurants by army recruiterswww.independent.co.uk☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 10 hours agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-squareDisplay name@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·5 hours agoTo clear things up for you, you stated that laws had nothing to do with morality, and that is false as previously seen. But I do agree that laws might not be a source of morality, even if some laws aim to alter how people view certain matters.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·5 hours agoIt’s like you can’t understand the concept of thing being tangential. Laws can align with morality or not, but morality is not derived from laws. Nor do laws have to be derived from morality.
minus-squareDisplay name@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·5 hours agoRead what I wrote again, you’re close to grasping it :)
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·5 hours agoI have the same to say to you. :)
minus-squarescoredseqrica@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·4 hours agoYou are being remarkably patient with this individual that is wilfully missing your point.
To clear things up for you, you stated that laws had nothing to do with morality, and that is false as previously seen.
But I do agree that laws might not be a source of morality, even if some laws aim to alter how people view certain matters.
It’s like you can’t understand the concept of thing being tangential. Laws can align with morality or not, but morality is not derived from laws. Nor do laws have to be derived from morality.
Read what I wrote again, you’re close to grasping it :)
I have the same to say to you. :)
You are being remarkably patient with this individual that is wilfully missing your point.