• InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, but Alaska uses dramatically less energy than… like, everywhere. Given that there are no people and the only industries are either oil or resources.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      oil and resource industries are pretty well known for being energy intensive no?

      last i checked industry is the primary energy consumer. Sure there’s less people in alaska, but it was just an example i picked, and the market economics would still be applicable there. If it’s cheaper to buy hydrogen, than it is to produce locally sourced power, that’s going to be what happens.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not in comparison to… normal things like people and manufacturing.

        And oil is oil, it’s self-powering. Many/most are powered off of the propane out-gassing to dedicated turbines.