• Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 minutes ago

    I hate these new logos these corporations make, the old jaguar logo looked like power the new one looks like some weird startup.

  • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    /uj Technically this is their new logo:

    J a G U a r is just their new typeface (I think that’s the name?); and apparently/allegedly is to make the pronunciation closer to UK English, rather than American.

    Either way, though - it’s still…

    /j

    …pReTtY fArKiN’ sToOoPiD.

  • Et Al@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Their logo doesn’t have a jaguar and their car commercial doesn’t have any cars. Fuck it, whatever

  • Aksamit@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Wow, they really took their logo from sexy, fast and expensive looking, to looking like an over priced soft drink?

    That’s impressive, haha.

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You’re all making fun of it but this new style did exactly what it intended to do. Everyone is talking about them now.

    • Liam Mayfair@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Yeah, for a whole 2 hours, until everyone moves on to bitch about the next thing and then Jaguar are stuck with the shitty new logo no-one recognises for long after that.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      If only they sold stuff that the people talking about it could afford in the first place, maybe that’d boost their sales.

  • max_dryzen
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    GUys I’m from 2040 2035, here’s Microsoft’s logo

    MS corporate comms army did a sik job getting across those inscrutable monolith vibes, I bet when it launched they all clapped (even though clapping is in performance reviews)

    BONUS: heres Amazon, Faceberg and Nvideo too (yay diversity)

    spoiler

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I would have failed every design class I took in college if I submitted that. Why such wide kerning? Why lower case but upper G? Why so round? Why so completely unreadable at a distance because of micro serifs? There isn’t one good design element in this.

    • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think they want people to focus on the “agua” and the j and r are just little accents on it like its word art rather than a logo. Like, I literally picture the marketing weirdos at the meeting going off like this.

      • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The “a” is the worst part for me. You can’t see those little stubbs at a distance. So it reads JoGuor at a distance. They didn’t just fail to create a good logo, they failed to preserve the name. One bit of advice I always give is “imagine this logo on the back of a golf card or a Pride brochure. If the logo isn’t crisp and readable in black and white in a 1/2 inch square then it sucks.” This design fails that test. Not just because of the messed up “a” but the wide spacing makes those unreadable "a"s even smaller than if the letters weren’t so widely spaced.

    • nepenthes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      It doesn’t say “car” at all either; no elegance or prestige. The old logo was sexy. New one looks like a logo for bottled water or something.

      Edit: it’s like going from James Bond to Austin Powers.

        • nepenthes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Ya, I wanted to use a bland spy but there aren’t any-- I was going to use the Spy vs Spy guys because they are the most generic-looking, but ultimately I kept Powers because while he is stylish and fun, he is also really immature and the logo looks immature to me.

  • mister_flibble@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I fucking hate this minimalist design trend more than it is probably reasonable to hate an aesthetic. It’s got the personality of unfinished drywall.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Honestly I think unfinished drywall has more personality. It’s utilitarian and rough around the edges, without the shiny surface veneer.

      That new Jaguar logo is like somebody took a beautiful old house full of exposed brick and wood work and put a coating of white paint over everything.

    • droporain@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The younger generation barely reads let alone reads cursive. This is next generation marketing you aren’t the audience I imagine.

      • mister_flibble@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        Even if that’s what’s going on (or at least that assumption on the part of the design team is what’s going on), this is shit. You know what requires even less reading than script OR basic print? THE FUCKING PICTURE OF THE FUCKING JUNGLE CAT.

      • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s what it is, isn’t it. Retirement in their design department, new hires and this is a Millenial message marketing to Gen Zers (and Alphas too, automotive preference starts early)

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          45 minutes ago

          Oh, I wasn’t being entirely serious, though there is an element of truth to it. It probably is a measurable cost savings over the scale of the business.

          I still think these unremarkable corporate logos are boring AF. Just makes them visually soulless along with just being corporate soulless.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Better:

      • Revolut (though a fintech company named after a revolution lacking the charge at the end is still moronic in several ways)
      • airbnb (from awful to meh)
      • Spotify (same)

      Worse:

      • Pinterest (original fit the platform and what it is/was pretty much perfectly. Current is meh)
      • eBay (both are bad IMO, but at least the original was bad in a playful and eye-catching way. The new one is just more meh
      • Burberry (the stag was notable and signalled a history of old-fashioned quality that’s suitably rugged. The new one is meh AND insecure about people knowing which London they’re from)
      • Rimova (yet another fashion brand apparently afraid of being noticed
      • DF (from one of the best and most fashion-appropriate logos to an absolute eyesore and kerning nightmare that invites vandalism)
      • Jaguar (From absolutely iconic and great in every way to even uglier than the new DF one. I hope whomever came up with that got both fired and beaten and I’m a pacifist.)

      The rest just go from meh to slightly different meh 🤷

    • Electric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Those old fashion logos are actually sick. Concerning that an industry that sells style would make these their logos.

  • iii
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    19 hours ago

    “We’re a tech company now!” logo