• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      34·
      2 days ago

      Ah yes, this must be from the great “wear a mask” trend of 2010. I remember those times well.

        • IDrawPoorly@lemm.eeEnglish
          72·
          1 day ago

          His argument is still applicable as if it were posted today.

          Yours that it’s ragebait implies (because ragebait implies that it’s based off a lie or something that no longer applies) doesn’t. It’s not “still” and wasn’t.

          • JargonWagon@lemmy.worldEnglish
            3·
            1 day ago

            Rage bait doesn’t imply it’s a lie, it’s attempting to get others to engage by inciting anger. Not to mention that even if it did imply a lie, why did they blur the dates out? To make you think this was a recent change? Still falls in line with your definition of rage bait misleading you. It definitely was and still is rage bait.