Too obvious to be funny, but i still wanted to draw a shitpost.

  • a_talking_is2 [comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    jesse-wtf What are you even trying to say? That our “brigading” somehow caused them to behave like a racist, homophobe, transphobe, sexist .etc? Look, even most people who’s country was invaded don’t use it as excuse for this kind of discrimination. And you’re talking about some shitposting in political threads?

    • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m saying this makes it look like you think your shit doesn’t stink. You’re not the bastion of reason it looks like you’re trying to present yourself as.

      I have no idea how you got to the interpretation you put there.

            • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Just because someone is wrong doesn’t make the other person right. American politics are a great demonstration of that.

              Similarly just because someone is a giant piece of shit doesn’t mean someone else is incapable of being crappy. I don’t know how it reads differently without assuming I’m incapable of understanding that.

              • marx_mentat [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                There are a lot of people who think being civil with bigots is as bad as being the source of bigotry itself. Civility with everyone is not a universal value.

                Some people take great offense when they see someone viewing bigotry as a failure in civility, a moral failing on the same level as being uncivil to bigots.

                • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I can understand that. I think part of what I’ve been failing to communicate with many is that civility works in stereo.

                  The comic, at face value, shows a breakdown on the bigot end. That fella should definitely be told to fuck off. But my complaint was the misrepresentation of the comic. If the start is the same but the response is something more like “the media is lying and you’re racist if you believe it” (this is hyperbole to make a point) then civility was not extended to civility. The bigot is still a bigot and should still be dealt with accordingly when they demonstrate it, but until they have exposed themselves as one why shouldn’t they be given the courtesy in case they’re not.

                  Does that track?

                  • marx_mentat [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I do see what you mean now. I think for a lot of people, the idea of being surrounded by secret bigots makes them feel incredibly unsafe and is a big source of anxiety in their lives. It may seem unnecessary to someone who doesn’t feel that kind of anxiety, but there really are a lot of bigots and toxic people in the fediverse who put in a good amount of effort to stay hidden. Getting these people to reveal themselves is as much a goal as driving them away or keeping them out. It’s an important tool in the moderation toolbox for spaces where this is a persistent issue.

                    Some people have gotten very good at getting these people to reveal themselves too. I haven’t seen all of these recent threads, but I suspect some of these strategies may come across as obnoxious to the uninitiated.