• TJA!@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    48 minutes ago

    The reason we have a Chinese competitor that we cannot directly control is that Meta is buying up every promising US platform and shutting it down. Or just trying to copy it so that the competitor does not get enough users

  • CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 hours ago

    So what does Zuck do when Trump uses an exec order to stay the ban and pushes Republicans to reverse it?

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 minutes ago

        Yep. But this doesn’t answer their question. I’m rooting for a Tik Tok CEO vs Meta CEO battle Royale at the inauguration.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Why does everyone think Trumps going to allow Tiktok. He doesn’t like China, and Musk is going to push him to ban it so he can buy it.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 hour ago

        ByteDance has a lot of money. Trump likes money. Trump’s only leverage over ByteDance is allowing TikTok, so he’ll do that in exchange for money

        Zuckerberg and Meta are much more centralized in the US, which gives Trump far more options in terms of what he can offer them. Trump will give Zuckerberg something else to placate him. Probably lots of cheap H-1B labor

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          If you haven’t noticed Trump says a lot of things. He’s always talking out of both sides of his mouth. I’ll believe it when I see it, we’ll see tomorrow. Also, a delay is not overturning it.

  • Taldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 minutes ago

    I don’t know why I do this to myself, but I read through Meta’s disclosure

    Every single lobbyist I looked at worked in DC before becoming a lobbyist. I knew it happened a lot, but it’s really depressing to see

    Also, why do these disclosures not require companies to specify how the money was spent? There are only ~20 different lobbyists mentioned, and Meta spent 7.6M in a single quarter