Oh no, people here have biases different from your own. The horror! Meanwhile, I provided sources in other responses in this thread. You could also just spend your time to google this stuff yourself instead of trolling here, it’s not exactly hidden.
I’m happy to question my own biases, but only when the other party is willing to act in good faith. You clearly aren’t. I checked, and none of your other posts in this thread cite sources that disprove what I’ve said.
What you said is demonstrably nonsense and I very much did link sources to the model, and the paper explaining how it works, and why it’s open source. Absolutely hilarious that you keep lying here while accusing me of acting in bad faith. You are an utter clown.
Oops, I didn’t realize I was posting on ML. That’s my bad, I should have expected this bias.
For the record, I don’t see any evidence or sources in your responses to me.
Have nice day.
Oh no, people here have biases different from your own. The horror! Meanwhile, I provided sources in other responses in this thread. You could also just spend your time to google this stuff yourself instead of trolling here, it’s not exactly hidden.
Bye!
I’m happy to question my own biases, but only when the other party is willing to act in good faith. You clearly aren’t. I checked, and none of your other posts in this thread cite sources that disprove what I’ve said.
What you said is demonstrably nonsense and I very much did link sources to the model, and the paper explaining how it works, and why it’s open source. Absolutely hilarious that you keep lying here while accusing me of acting in bad faith. You are an utter clown.