Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez denied claims that she is secretly wealthy, stating she is worth less than $500,000 and doesn’t trade stocks or take corporate money.

Her financial disclosures show modest savings and student debt.

Some conservatives on X, despite opposing her politics, praised her perceived integrity.

Accusations of political corruption have surged online, partly fueled by Elon Musk.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 minutes ago

    They’re so concerned about profittering they support a guy that was giving millions directly from China, took millions in goverment funds by making secret service stay in his hotels and charging them 1000x the rate of any other guest. This guy’s will pay their life down for the biggest kleptocrat in US history, but yeah AOC needs to be monitored.

  • onlyoneIbought@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I love it when rich guys pretend to hate corruption. You ARE the corruption, idiot

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      Well obviously you do. Or she isnt trying to help people. She admitted to having hundreds of thousands of dollars

      • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        36 minutes ago

        You have no idea what you’re talking about. 500k in assets is like a decent house that you’re still making payments on, a couple cars, and some 401k savings. People like that are not the problem. That lifestyle should be the base level for every single American, imo.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        Too bad she doesn’t have hundreds of thousands of MILLIONS of dollars or she could really help the little guy like Musk and his administration.

  • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Accusations of political corruption have surged online, partly fueled by Elon Musk.

    Lol, says the guy who’s currently at the top of corrupting world-politics…

  • solaceinrage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    I don’t think people realize how big the crossover is between AOC and Trump. A lot of centrists that flipped were Bernie bros. that tired of stuff like identity politics and the DNC backstabbing that shafted Bernie.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    How is she so fucking corrupt already?! She claims she’s not wealthy and then in the next sentence says she “only has hundreds of tbousands of dollars in the bank”

    If you have hundreds of thousands of dollars in the bank, that makes you rich

    • figaro@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      41 minutes ago

      The job of being in congress pays 174k per year, so having some amount of money after doing that job for multiple years is inevitable.

      AOC is one of the most outspoken leftists in the government. If anyone deserves the benefit of the doubt it is her.

    • Nitchevo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      I’m starting to understand how people like Trump keep getting into office. Either you have no reading comprehension, or you’re being completely disingenuous. I’m a highschool dropout making low 6 figures that’s lucky enough to have a few merger assets and a 401k, and I’m “worth” more than AOC. I’m also 10 years older than her.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    she is worth less than $500,000

    That sounds like a lot of money still, but I’d imagine public figures can easily leverage that to wealth so makes sense

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      36 minutes ago

      Jesus, people need to learn to read a damn article.

      Her financial disclosure form last year showed she had no more than $46,000 across her checking, savings, brokerage, and 401(k) accounts, and owed between $15,000 and $50,000 of student loans.

      Forbes estimated Ocasio-Cortez’s net worth last year at about $125,000 with most of her wealth in a Thrift Savings Plan — a 401(k)-style investment vehicle for government employees that doesn’t have to be listed in financial disclosures.

      And no it’s not that unusual for ordinary people to have 500k net worth. Buy a house, put in a few percent in your 401k in index funds, and the you go.

    • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      She doesn’t even own her own home, or she lives in a shark at that value. No second property: no cottage or landlording.

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Can we all please notice how under capitalism, you can refer to people being ‘worth’ a dollar amount? Money is something you have, it says nothing about who you are. I’m fine with having an amount of wealth, but your worth is not measured in dollars, that’s fucked

    • NoEsReal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 minutes ago

      I get what you’re saying. But the term is generally used to clarify that the amount quoted reflects the person’s assets and their value, and not just their liquid cash. Which a lot of people in this thread seem to not understand. I agree we should probably use a different term for that, but for now it works as easy short hand for “this is is how much this person owns in assets and liquid cash combined.”

      I might be wrong on this, but I think the term also includes income into the account, like how much someone brings in per year. And it might also subtract debt, though I’m not sure of either of those.

  • SabinStargem@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I hope that AOC has a security detail, a go bag and plan, and an ideal state to reside in. It is my expectation for Yarvin’s Cabel to try to capture or assasinate her at some point, since she is one of the few major lightning rods to be the president of a Free America. We will need great people to organize the defense of our people against the fascist agenda.

    Bernie, AOC, others, stay safe and strong. 🖖

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’s pretty absurd that y’all qaeda bitch about all the money that (insert lib politician) makes while throwing money or votes at billionaires who then turn around and accuse lib politicians like AOC or Sanders of being rich.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I think if we don’t start WW3 and nuke the planet she’s gonna be the first woman president in the US

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I hope so, but she’s going to have to get through at least another four years, probably more, of being ratted and feathered by Republicans, and somehow still look clean

      I still contend that was the real problem with Hillary Clinton. Not that she was a poor candidate or hade some questionable decisions but that Repugnants spent years throwing shit at her so she looked like a mess. She was at least as good as a candidate as anyone else and many of the objections were manufactured

      • NoEsReal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        I honestly think the problem with Hillary had less to do with her as a person and more with the fact that it felt like she was being forced on folks. I am not as educated on all the shenanigans the DNC pulled to get her to be the nominee over Bernie, but I know that for a lot of folks it felt like the DNC just did what they obviously keep doing and gave the job to the person they deemed “deserved it” for their own internal bs reasons, while ignoring the constituents they claim to represent. Her nomination felt like a precursor to Harris being nominated without a primary. I think that’s also where a lot of disillusionment comes from on the left, the dem party just doesn’t seem to have any desire to even pretend that they care about their constituents

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      The DNC would murder her if she broke through their primary defenses and got close enough.

      They’re fine with losing, the pendulum is part of the grift, what they aren’t fine with is losing their half of that bipartisan oligarch gravy train. Our capitalists don’t bribe both parties to have those parties stand against economic metastasis at all human cost.

      We can have affirmation ribbons and be sucked dry by the oligarchs, or we can have scapegoating and be sucked dry by the oligarchs, that is the extent of our “freedom.” Reagan and Kemp saw to that by getting their former opposition on the take.

      • bayesianbandit@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Serious talk. When are people going to start calling them DINOs. Democrats In Name Only from the Jurassic period.

        You think Trump took over the RNC because the old guard liked him?? No he built on the backs of the tea party.

        Bernie and the squad were the lefts tea party. What they need now is a charismatic leader to build on it and kick the DINOs out by force.

        The DNC is not that powerful. We outnumber them. Stop forgetting we outnumber them.

        • NoEsReal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 minutes ago

          I think this needs to be the strategy for sure. The progressives on the left need to start looking for truly progressive candidates to challenge each established Dem that is up for grabs in the 2026 primaries. Our real fight for democracy is no longer in the general election, it’s in the primaries. If we can’t change the Democratic Party then our only choices are a quick or a slow death

        • SabinStargem@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          41 minutes ago

          I call the old guard Geronocrats myself. They are old, tired, and very much uninspired. Far as I can tell, Bernie is the only ancient congress critter who is worthy of being called a leader.

          Just look at the bill Hakeem Jeffries is trying to pass: to make raiding the US treasury illegal. WTF do we need a new laws for that?

      • FKA_Demosthenes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Now would be a great time to just put the democratic party out of its misery. Looking around the party, we can be comforted that at least it will go peacefully, in its sleep. Let’s at least see if we can get a fresh new party out of all this shit.

        • SabinStargem@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          15 hours ago

          That would be the golden lining from this whole damn mess - political reforms that make the spirit of the Constitution have genuine power, and a rebalancing of the scales. People like Musk should be extinguished, never to return from that dark cesspit known as capitalism.

        • Allonzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Good thing I don’t have that.

          If I did, I’d help protect the system when the molitovs start flying at it like a good house slave, I hope to assist when it isn’t just me, as that would just be suicide by cop.

          This isn’t class war, this is 50 years of class occupation and counting. Peaceful positive change has been made impossible here on multiple levels by the owners. I put my hope in the other thing, as that’s the only rational place left to put it.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Unless the republicans field a multiple rapist convict again. Then it’s a tossup and a guaranteed L, if there’s a war somewhere the genocide people can get behind.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      100
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’m glad it seems that many democrats are quitting their Gatekeeping bullshit with AOC.

      So frustrating to see people so concerned about the perception of some strawman caricature the right manufacture for our best fighters that we turn on our own. If it wasn’t obvious, they attack her so relentlessly because they fear her and know her potential more some of our own.

      • Allonzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Nancy Pelosi dedicated the month before Trump was inaugurated to ensuring AOC, a spoiler leftist in a sea of her crony neoliberals, didn’t get an oversight committee seat.

        Neoliberals Democrats hate actual leftwing politicians far more than they hate their fascist opposition party. Makes sense, Fascists and neoliberals have the same bosses and take the same bribe checks.

      • Tyrangle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’m more moderate and have always respected AOC, but thought she was too extreme to make a good president. I genuinely believe that the president should be someone who wants to build coalitions and steer the country towards a better future without allowing it to fracture. I still believe that, but I recognize now that my way of thinking can’t win elections in this modern era of politics. Now is the time for a firebrand - someone who would rather lose than compromise. I would still be worried about civil war if AOC became president, but I’m already worried about that now, so no point in holding it against her.

        • bayesianbandit@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          The irony here is AOC is the one who can build meaningful coalitions you haven’t even realized are possible yet.

          The working class is the largest player in this game and she speaks directly to the working class of all stripes.

          Moderate neoliberal DINOs speak only to capitalists. That’s why they lost their old base who all went to the right.

        • moakley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          14 hours ago

          AOC can build coalitions. She even wrote legislation with Ted Cruz. She only stopped working with him after he effectively tried to have her killed on January 6th.

        • SabinStargem@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I think compromise can only work, if the the other guy thought they could lose it all if things went terribly. Compromising ahead of time says “We both get something, no matter what.” Which in turn removes the fear of loss.

          This is a bad quality in a politician, as it excuses sleeping at the wheel. There is no fire under their ass to keep them awake.

      • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        A thought I had a few days ago,

        The left is all about inclusivity and forgiveness unless you’ve made any amount of mispropriety, then it’s a race to drop you as quick as possible.

        The right is all about being held accountable for your transgressions, law and order, you do the crime you pay the time, but they have 0 cares about their leaders being held accountable.

        I feel like each party is the watchdog for the others politicians, and the left is way too accepting of the right wings transgressions, while the right wing hammers the left as quick and hard as possible (except we just do it to ourselves!)

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Just looked him up and he looks shit.

        AOC is great because she is outspoken and holds actual left wing values compared to 99.9% of her party.

        This clown seems like a Kamala-lite with his boasting on his law enforcement and military service history.

        • _wizard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          He’s one of the few checks that is actively trying to to regain balance to this shit show. Do not discount a lawyer at the state level.

          • jaaake@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 minutes ago

            There’s a difference between offering opposition to outright fascism, and being the hope of the future of a political party. The bar is so low right now that I’m happy whenever I hear of someone pushing back in any amount, but AOCs passion and unrelenting sense of justice is fucking inspiring.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      We would need 60 of her in the senate, or literally anybody else on the blue team, for America to have any hope. Otherwise Republicans will filibuster any spec of salvation.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Which is why, for now, the Democrats need to be pulling all the tactics McConnell demonstrated for them under Obama.

        FILIBUSTER EVERYTHING.

        This is not the time for Democrats to be the Party of smooth-running government.

        Use those loopholes the Right-stealers gave themselves in the rules. The only thing they should be voting for is bills that entangle, delay, or reject Trump’s blitzkrieg.

        And if they have to talk across the aisle, it should be to remind them that if they hand the Power of the Purse over now, they’ll never get it back and they’ll lose all their value to lobbyists, all their stock-market prescience, all their importance back home.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          15 hours ago

          That’s the fun part, the Republicans in Congress are hardly even attempting to pass any laws. All they’re doing is appointments, which can’t be filibustered as of 2013, except for SCOTUS which can’t be filibustered as of 2017.

          All they have to do now is not stop Trump and they win, because Congress is in charge of reigning him in.

          You cannot filibuster against doing nothing.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            What do you mean, “can’t be filibustered?” You fucking shout to drown out the person trying to conduct the vote, and you don’t stop until you and every other non-fascist have been forcibly removed.

            • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I know you were talking about an old timey filibuster and not the modern one.

              But for anyone curious, Certain spending bills — bills that deal with spending, revenue, and the debt ceiling — only require a simple majority. There’s a bunch of rules about what can be in the bills and how many times a year you can use reconciliation (once for each of the three topics per year). Basically, no policy changes; just the basic budget stuff allowed.

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconciliation_(United_States_Congress)

              Not that rules matter in DC anymore. Congress is apparently letting Elon Musk handle appropriations and if Republicans don’t care about the Constitution (or even their own personal power), I doubt like they’ll be worried about following Senate procedure.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              Obstruction of Congress is a Felony, that is why all the rules are laid out for who gets to speak at what time. Anything outside what is explicitly allowed, believe it or not, straight to jail.

              Now if they can get the Capitol Police on their side for a little while that would by them time until the National Guard shows up, but then what?

                • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  sorry for the duplicate comment, the page crashed while I was submitting it so I redid it lol

                  Legal only matters based on enforcement, and Republicans are in charge of enforcement, so it’s a real conundrum. Feel free to try if you want, though.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I hope that we can also get a younger white male progressive to work along side her. Not because I think they’d be better, but it might help draw emotionally fragile men who can’t accept a woman in charge. Also, it would mean another progressive reaching the masses, which is always good.

      • Welt@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        16 hours ago

        A lot of men are sick of being told they’re emotionally fragile for not wanting to be accused of thoughtcrime. Both sides are responsible for this situation and it doesn’t help to attack the base you’re seeking support from. Dems and you need to learn this.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        A millionaire lawyer who

        was named as co-chair of the 2024 Harris-Walz campaign and is currently a part of the Democratic Congressional Progressive Caucus.

        While giving her husband huge security contracts and buying houses in Hawaii?

        Hard pass

        • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Go on you valiant crusader.

          Continue to shit on anyone who isn’t perfect,

          Please let us know when you find the correct candidate.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            I did, it was AOC. I said so up above.

            The last thing anyone needs right now is more of the same Democrats who never walk the walk, we need more AOCs.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I mean let’s be honest with ourselves: Anyone who had any relation with the braindead mess that was the Walz-Harris campaign should be instantly made out of consideration.

            • RippleEffect@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Walz seemed like a pretty decent choice and I liked him a bit. Is there something I’m not realizing about him?

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                I’m talking more about the absolutely moronic way the campaign was run than the candidates themselves. Harris and Walz themselves were salvageable (sans Gaza, they were genuinely hopeless there) but anyone who was involved in actually running the campaign and deciding the platform is either braindead or a corporate stooge and either way shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near future elections.

                Also to answer your question Walz is the “Israel has a right to expand its borders” guy.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      she’s the real deal, but i fear she’s been too vilified by the diaper and his cult, and the far-right wastes of humanity that broadcast all the bullshit that enable him, to make successful run for the white house.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Any effective progressive is going to be vilified. They will be attacked from all sides, and all of their dirty laundry will be made public. Every flaw, every misstep, every gaff, all of it will be blown out of proportion by the machine they threaten.

        • SabinStargem@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          14 hours ago

          They should embrace it. Point out that they are NOT the old guard, and point out the hypocrisy. Trump is a literal rapist. Get the poor women who got molested onto billboards, church sermons, ask musicians to make songs about how crappy Trump is.

          The passivity of the Geronocrats is why they lost the respect of people.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Bernie knew this, to his credit, and made a point to repeat it often, but people weren’t hearing it.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        And Trump hasn’t been vilified?

        Vilification doesn’t matter, getting people to turn up matters.