HSR🏴☠️@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science MemesEnglish · edit-21 个月前Entropy? Never heard of it.lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square157fedilinkarrow-up1472arrow-down164cross-posted to: climatememes@lemmy.world
arrow-up1408arrow-down1imageEntropy? Never heard of it.lemmy.dbzer0.comHSR🏴☠️@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science MemesEnglish · edit-21 个月前message-square157fedilinkcross-posted to: climatememes@lemmy.world
minus-squareThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 个月前Why does it have to be cheaper? Why not both?
minus-squarestarman2112@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 个月前Because if it isn’t cheaper than simply growing trees, the money would be better spent simply growing trees
minus-squareThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 个月前And places trees don’t grow?
minus-squarestarman2112@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 个月前Try thinking for a second. Places where trees don’t grow are probably not the best places for carbon sequestration if you can’t sequester carbon there cheaper or easier than sequestering carbon in trees elsewhere
Why does it have to be cheaper? Why not both?
Because if it isn’t cheaper than simply growing trees, the money would be better spent simply growing trees
And places trees don’t grow?
Try thinking for a second.
Places where trees don’t grow are probably not the best places for carbon sequestration if you can’t sequester carbon there cheaper or easier than sequestering carbon in trees elsewhere