I tried researching, but I stumbled upon conflicting results. Anyone familiar with this one?

  • Mothra
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    If you can, OP, take a close up short showing the shape of the leaves and branches. This is good to describe the overall shape of the tree but not enough to id.

  • BotB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Automatic identification via PlantNet summary

    Most likely match: Corynocarpus laevigatus J.R.Forst. & G.Forst.

    Common name Scientific name Likeliness
    Karaka Corynocarpus laevigatus 11.18 %
    Australian Laurel Pittosporum tobira 10.35 %
    White milkwood Sideroxylon inerme 6.48 %
    Strawberry tree Arbutus unedo 6.40 %
    Chinese banyan Ficus microcarpa 5.21 %

    Beep, boop

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically.

  • nettle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    You said you got it from online so i did a quick search for matching images and the photo comes from Trees South africa (the watermark that is partly cropped out in your image says this to) according to their website it is Harpephyllum caffrum.

    https://trees-sa.co.za/tree/harpephyllum-caffrum/

    Higher resolution image is on this sight which further back up it being Harpephyllum caffrum (leaf shape and arrangement match) def not karaka as karaka leaves are shaped differently.

    Edit: red --> resolution (stupid auto correct)