After weeks of local speculation, the purchasers of 55,000 acres of northern California land have been revealed. The group Flannery Associates – backed by a cohort of Silicon Valley investors – has quietly purchased $800m worth of agricultural and empty land, the New York Times has reported. Their goal is to build a utopian new town that will offer its thousands of residents reliable public transportation and urban living, all of which would operate using clean energy.
They could just pay their fucking taxes so we can have trains
But think of all the jobs they’ll “create”!
(/s so hard)
That’s not even limited by taxes, it’s limited by 4 fucking companies owning most of the tracks, and them being given free reign to run freight as shittily as possible, not maintain the tracks unless actively forced to, and giving precisely 0 fucks about passenger service.
The US likely cannot fix its rail issue without nationalizing the rail system. As a country, it has yet to admit that there are
somemany problems capitalism a) does not fix and b) actively makes worse.Ugh, there’s that doom ulcer again
Lol again with this? Wealthy fucks have been trying this since the 1700s. It never works.
CA is already only for wealthy people.
Lemmy users: We need more housing, walkable cities, public transport, and renewable energy
Developer: Plans to build more housing in a new walkable city with public transport powered by renewable energy
Lemmy users: Not like that!
Correct, most people don’t approve of the oligarchy building another haven for the ultra-rich on farmland.
Where do you get the impression this is built “for the ultra-rich”? Why would they be taking public transport over their personal jets and private cars? Why would they live in an urban area with tens of thousands of other residents instead of their personal mansions on acreage? This is definitely an investment for upper-middle to upper class residents.
As for farmland, article itself says “bad soil that only contributes 5% of the county’s agricultural production”. When you need housing, housing needs to go somewhere.
Your government isn’t going to build the cities the climate needs, if tech investors want to with their own cash I say go for it.
While I don’t fully disagree with you, these towns being funded by the ultra-rich, usually by people who already have shady business practices, are looking awfully like company towns. Amazon’s already trying to build company-provided housing near a lot of their hubs, which is bad in that now your healthcare AND your shelter are directly tied to your employment. Imagine if they get their way with building a whole micro-city that runs on that idea - where every last bit of wealth an employee might spend goes STRAIGHT back to your company. Their utilities get dealt with by Amazon-built power and water plants. Their food is provided by Amazon grocery stores or deliveries. Your healthcare is provided by Amazon, and your housing is at the whim of your employer. All of this is provided at jacked-up prices, of course, so you’re effectively just a debt slave until you die or the company decides to kick you to the curb.
It’s being built by an investment firm though, doesn’t look to be company housing, just looks like an investment to me.
I get that impression from this little thing called the title of the post
Didn’t make it past the title huh
History.
Right, why think critically and make an intelligent argument when you can just hand-wave “history” lol
Said the guy who hears “wealthy consortium of capitalists” and thinks “wow save me daddies,” lul.
Whatever you say strawman, keep up with your scorched earth policy of gatekeeping who’s allowed to fight climate change.
I fucking hate that they used the term “empty” land. The poll question posed to residents asked them if they would be more in favor if they knew it was “bad soil” that only contributed to 5% of CA agriculture, as though making money is all that land is good for.
Yes, Fairfield, CA is kind of a shit hole. But NorCal open land is absolutely beautiful, like all of California. Every single fucking time I go there, which is pretty frequently, there are new mcmansion housing developments and business parks and data centers that are starting to be built or have just finished. There are protected wetlands between Sacramento and the east bay (far east) where migratory birds come back every year. Just because they don’t build on the fucking wetlands doesn’t mean this constant building isn’t going to affect what little nature is left. I’m so fucking sick of seeing my home paved over for profit and I feel so powerless to do anything. Because I am powerless.
As if that weren’t enough, we all know this is going to be some walled-off rich-people city where they can escape from us proles, right? Sick shit.
They’re building more data centres and California has a water shortage?
Now how long will it take the ecology to recover from the extended drought? Hydrologic recovery is only the first step.
Ah thanks, I missed that fact.
5% of California’s agriculture isn’t “bad soil.”
deleted by creator
The American Dream was get married and have a job, buy a house, have a family, and retire.
Now it is to be so rich and wealthy that you don’t have to care about anyone else.
Now it is to be so rich and wealthy that you don’t have to care about anyone else.
That has always been part of the dream. It’s just you can only get there if you were born on third base now.
In my day they were called New Towns.
They’re all shit holes now.
as Adam Something on YouTube puts it, ultra rich people + construction equals dumb shit.
it’s going to end up soulless and miserable, no doubt
just a series of mansions connected by roads, completely forgetting any sort of amenities or ability to produce things locally, because rich people think “mom and pop store” is when get your parents to bring things along on their private jet.
- City built by tech bros
- Utopian
Pick one.
Told you it’s rich doom preppers who will build a literal walled garden.
Yep, it’s a return to feudalism and vassalage. A fortress for themselves and their servants (billionaires don’t do their own cooking and cleaning, they are important people afterall).
They know they need reasons for people to pledge fealty and they think public transport, apartments and clean energy is enough of a drawcard for their workers. The sad part is that they have eroded workers rights so far that they may well be right. Many other places in the world, these perks are much more normal.
They misspelt distopian.
You also misspelt dystopian.
Oh god… Its an epidemic!!!
Both are correct, because there is no universal spelling standard in English.
Even if there was, it would be run by nerds and you can beat them up.
In seriousness, both are correct, but dys is more correct. Dis is the Latin prefix, dys the Greek (from the Latin, language is fun), but utopia is Greek as well.
Dis was nonetheless a common enough spelling before dys became the generally preferred.
I’ve never seen “dis” used, and even if we were using Latin prefixes wouldn’t that mean “benetopia” would be as correct as “eutopia”? It’s pretty clear that OP spelled it wrong which was very funny in context.
Funny you bring that up, because “cacotopia/kakotopia” (re: spelling is largely aesthetics) was actually the first iteration of the idea.
I see no problems with anyone wanting to be fancy and dropping a “Benetopia” in any future manifestos.
In spanish we use “dis”
Do you have a source? I looked it up just in case it was a regional or outdated spelling, but all I could find was “Dustopia”, the original spelling of “dystopia”, first appeared in Lewis Henry Younge’s Utopia: or Apollo’s Golden Days in 1747.
My source is the personal experience of having to listen to linguists too much, and having read enough English works and journals prior to the popularization of standardized spellings under the likes of Webster.
They just did whatever they fucking wanted, sometimes, it’s actually the worst.
Every generation gets the Galt’s Gulch it deserves
I’m just disappointed they aren’t building it underwater.
Night city didn’t work out so great in Cyberpunk 2077
This is also giving me BioShok vibes.
Can’t wait to owe my soul to the company store
Encircles an air force base. Why would anyone want to live encircling an air force base?
I bet they’ll act like people who move next to a farm and complain about the smell.
“Hiiii, we’re your neighbors down the road. Do you think you could not fly your little airplanes around? They’re awfully loud. Thanks bunches!”
You joke, but the towns of Portola Valley and Woodside (south of SF) are so wealthy and powerful they literally rerouted some plane routes by pulling strings of the FAA because they didn’t like the noise.
deleted by creator
They will all serve and work for the military.
Military based economy.
More pro-war people, proxy wars for everyone.
Might as well call it Night City from Cyberpunk 2077.
There has to be more to this story…
If the distinguishing features are public transportation and clean energy, they’re probably not building it to live in themselves. And while there’s a big demand for more housing in the Bay Area generally, Solono County is a bit of a commute for current workers.
It feels like they’re building this as a company town for some yet-to-be-announced new business project that they want to be isolated from existing urban areas.
(edit) I guess I don’t mean “urban areas” so much as areas where employees would have contact with other Silicon Valley firms and culture.
Agreed, regardless of what this is there’s a 100% chance that it’s a profit scheme and has nothing to do with building anything practical for anyone
deleted by creator
It’s obvious they’re trying to corner the milk steak market.
Jelly Belly jelly bean factory
Vengeance for those Harry Potter beans.
Just a bunch of rich fucks trying to con other rich fucks and hope to leave whoever is holding their junk bonds in the lurch.
