• wahming@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In what way is it torture and suffering, do explain. Research animals almost without exception have better quality of life than industrial farms.

    • kevin
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well that’s an excessively low bar.

    • Hotwarioinyourarea Ⓥ@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      On industrial farms there is zero quality of life so it’s not exactly a high bar…

      How are we getting these organs out? Killing them and then removing them? Or are we going to grow clusters and cut them out when needed?

      It sounds like a dystopian nightmare to me.

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They perform exactly the same function in the animals as they do for us, so they grow in the same location. Yes the animals would be butchered in the removal process. Why is that any more dystopian than killing them at a butcher?

          • wahming@monyet.cc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So essentially no worse than the factory farms of today, you admit. Except, this one actually saves lives.

            • Hotwarioinyourarea Ⓥ@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Factory farms are also an aberration and a crime against sentient beings. This just adds a dollop more “cruel and unusual” and it’s not saving lives it’s torturing and sacrificing one feeling, thinking, and intelligent life so a human can live another 5 years.