• HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      or be intersex. this is sorta been what at least part of this conversation has been about. I mentioned in another post but my understanding about modern trans would be a persons right to determine what their gender is which does not have to be the same as their sex. Im honestly not sure about my own understanding.

      • RandyButternubs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        So then explain what you meant. Why is being trans before surgical augmentation going to be difficult, if you agree that you don’t need surgery to be trans. Make that make sense, cause it sounds like a transmedicalist shit take

        • HubertManne@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It means there is little you can do about it at that point. Its like people dreamed of flight before planes but the dream was only realized once the technology was there.

          • RandyButternubs@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            trans before surgical augemtation is going to be a bit difficult

            It means there is little you can do about it at that point

            Not every trans person wants or needs surgery, we are not a monolith of gender. Yet once more you are insinuating that surgery is like some wright brothers fever dream. For some, just living and being accepted as their gender is the goal. Implying that without surgery, there’s little you can do about it, is fucking rude at best, and transmedicalist bullshit at worst. You admit you know very little, yet here you are telling trans people about their experience. You should stop now.

            • HubertManne@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              ok. you have to understand there was cross dressing for a long time. so it gets back to is cross dressing trans or whatnot and maybe in some cases but not in others. So if someone identifies as the opposite gender of their sex but does not emulate the gender in any way it sorta becomes moot. Its like just in their heart.

                • HubertManne@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  stop? that was the first mention and if you had any nuance you would see that what im saying is if a person is trans and takes no action to emulate their prefered gender then are they trans. Basically what is trans then. Can you define simply and succinctly.

                  • RandyButternubs@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Fucking Liar. You gonna pretend this isn’t you?

                    I mean this gets complicated. Is cross dressing trans? Because cross dressers doesn’t necessarily identify as another sex. Where does an effiminate male stand or a tomboy? What does someone get labled if they identify but don’t otherwise want to take the trappings? https://lemm.ee/comment/3521119

                    and

                    But what made the knight intersex? The clothing? https://lemm.ee/comment/3521575

                    Which makes your comment to me the third time you’ve implied gender is about the clothing. I’m looking at all the other fucked up things you’ve said in this thread, and I’m flagging every questionable thing. FUCK. OFF.