Where is the proof that the explosion on the street did not hit SBU offices on that street which was reported in the source I linked. Where is the proof?
And what I actually said is that the news article I linked said the office was hit, while an official Ukrainian account collaborates that information indirectly by showing the explosion on the street where the office is. You continue to be stunningly bad at trolling. I guess NAFO gets the quality of work they pay for. 😂
I stated that you don’t hold yourself to the same level of proof that you require of others. The statement that SBU offices were hit has far more evidence to support it than the opposite. Yet, here you still are hours later not being able to admit this.
You are free to admit being wrong, you know. It can be refreshing. Especially given that it’s obvious to everyone reading this thread. You’re not fooling anybody here.
I gave you sources, you never contradicted them. Two of the sources say that the SBU offices were hit, third source shows an explosion on the street the offices are located. I love how you’re still struggling with this. Why am I under the burden of providing even more evidence?
Where is the proof that the explosion on the street did not hit SBU offices on that street which was reported in the source I linked. Where is the proof?
deleted by creator
But it is being reported by the Russians https://www.rt.com/russia/564369-central-kiev-hit-missile-strikes-officials/?ysclid=l94g0drxyb929926457
And what I actually said is that the news article I linked said the office was hit, while an official Ukrainian account collaborates that information indirectly by showing the explosion on the street where the office is. You continue to be stunningly bad at trolling. I guess NAFO gets the quality of work they pay for. 😂
deleted by creator
I haven’t switched anything. Please work on your reading comprehension.
deleted by creator
I stated that you don’t hold yourself to the same level of proof that you require of others. The statement that SBU offices were hit has far more evidence to support it than the opposite. Yet, here you still are hours later not being able to admit this.
You are free to admit being wrong, you know. It can be refreshing. Especially given that it’s obvious to everyone reading this thread. You’re not fooling anybody here.
deleted by creator
I gave you sources, you never contradicted them. Two of the sources say that the SBU offices were hit, third source shows an explosion on the street the offices are located. I love how you’re still struggling with this. Why am I under the burden of providing even more evidence?