• Soselin@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_du_seigneur

    The wealth worship is progressing. It’s a secular prosperity gospel. “Since we know for a fact that capitalism rewards the most capable individuals with success it therefore follows the wealthiest are our most capable individuals. Being the most capable means being the smartest, strongest, the healthiest. So clearly they have the best genes. The wealthy are an innately superior group, selected by nature to be a superior class of individual to lead us all. Let us cleanse the word of the inferior poors.”

  • hfkldjbuq@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The “longtermists”. This has nothing to do with saving humanity; this has everything to do to assure they—who unjustly hold power, resources, capital—maintain and escalate their status throughout human existence.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Capitalism has never come out of feudalism, it has simply put a label of “democracy” on it.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      There are a few cosmetic changes, you don’t have the birthright anymore and serfs can move between owners freely. Structurally it is largely the same system though.

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The difference is that landlords and kings have been exchanged for large corporations and banks, with spokespersons we call politicians.

          • Zerush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Never was an circle, power has never left the hands of the elites, more than on short occasions after a revolution, only to be seized again immediately. The population never had real sovereignty.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              Having grown up in USSR, I have to disagree there. USSR had inequality, but nowhere close to the levels seen under capitalism. There also wasn’t an elite class because social mobility was very high. All the leaders of USSR came from humble backgrounds and working class families. If USSR took a different turn in the 90s we could’ve been living in a much better world today.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I don’t, my family moved after the collapse. At this point I don’t see any real difference between Russia and other capitalist countries.

              • Zerush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 years ago

                You have said it yourself, the advance did not last long and we do not live in a better world, but in a world in the hands of an elite, for whom a briefcase with money is worth more than the life and well-being of the population. To quote G.Orwell in Animal Farm, when pigs learned to walk on 2 legs.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  USSR was the first serious attempt at challenging global capitalism. While capitalist world ultimately prevailed over USSR, it may not outlive USSR for much longer the way things are going. Capitalism is an inherently self destructive system, and it cannot last forever. Ultimately, the elites rely on the masses being compliant in order to perpetuate the system of oppression. This contract only works as long as people are willing to put up with the class relations as they are.

  • DoroWat_Connoisseur@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    When the majority of the wealth is acquired by a minority… I blame debt: You need it for basic life essentials like a car and education and a house. For years, you don’t actually own the car or house. In the end, you pay them almost twice because of interest. If you can’t make the payments, they’ll offer you a new contract that lasts twice as long.

    You will always be hedged in. You will always be paying someone. You will own nothing of worth. For some good news, you can minimize the impact if you are clever financially.

    If change is happening, I’d vote to disband the fractional reserve system.