• PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Yeah but the circle of people with such view on history isn’t exactly very diverse. Maoists, trots (depending on which period of USSR we ask), maybe nazbols.

    I guess it could also be russian nationalists, from that weird type that think both USSR and Russian Empire were good.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes, Deng reforms could be viewed very ambiguously. Imagine if after Deng came people like Gorbachev and Yeltsin instead of Jiang, Hu and Xi, we would now be speaking the exact points that maoists are, but it would be true.

        As i chose to view it, is that Deng did a huge leap of trust in the future generations, and they, especially Xi, did not betrayed that trust.

      • whoami@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        I wish people on the ultra-left would understand its not that we love deng

        Or that we “love” anyone. We’re just capable of putting things in historical context and understanding the pros and cons of their actions