poor nemechek is easy to refute. read it they attribute the water used to raise cotton for the textile industry as water used to produce beef. the methodology is fucked.
Tell me you didn’t read the study without telling me you didn’t read the study. This is hilarious and you can’t find one legitimate article backing you up
I did. You have your opinion, I have mine and the opinion of thousands of climate scientists. Let’s agree to disagree until you find a peer-reviewed source.
poor nemechek is easy to refute. read it they attribute the water used to raise cotton for the textile industry as water used to produce beef. the methodology is fucked.
Tell me you didn’t read the study without telling me you didn’t read the study. This is hilarious and you can’t find one legitimate article backing you up
poore nemecek supports what I’m saying.
Really? Can’t find a single source?
my source is poore-nemecek 2018
Which backs my claim bud. Show me the paper-reviewed criticism of it
the methodology is fucked. read it.
I did. You have your opinion, I have mine and the opinion of thousands of climate scientists. Let’s agree to disagree until you find a peer-reviewed source.
another appeal to authority.
Fine, since you clearly are incapable of finding evidence, just copy and paste the quotes from their methodology that you don’t like.