Its a goldmine. I only checked a few so far and its full of omissions, claiming random movements to be anarchist and decreeing random ones marxist.
This is what the radlibs mean when they claim the ebil tankies always killing them.
Its a goldmine. I only checked a few so far and its full of omissions, claiming random movements to be anarchist and decreeing random ones marxist.
This is what the radlibs mean when they claim the ebil tankies always killing them.
It’s for followers of Chomsky, who’ve read and agreed with Marx, but still accept Chomsky’s anti-Marxist, anti-Communist, ‘libertarian socialism’ (which he has refused to define—because he’s a grifter who knows there’s little of substance behind the label). Marxism-can-provide-what-liberalism-promises-so-long-as-it-doesn’t-lead-to-communism-types.
Or not?